Back to Search Start Over

Wrist Reconstruction after En bloc Resection of Bone Tumors of the Distal Radius

Authors :
Weijian Liu
Baichuan Wang
Shuo Zhang
Yubin Li
Binwu Hu
Zengwu Shao
Source :
Orthopaedic Surgery, Vol 13, Iss 2, Pp 376-383 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Wiley, 2021.

Abstract

Wrist reconstruction after en bloc resection of bone tumors of the distal radius has been a great challenge. Although many techniques have been used for the reconstruction of long bone defects following en bloc resection of the distal radius, the optimal reconstruction method remains controversial. This is the first review to systematically describe various reconstruction techniques. We not only discuss the indications, functional outcomes, and complications of these reconstruction techniques but also review the technical refinement strategies for improving the stability of the wrist joint. En bloc resection should be performed for Campanacci grade III giant cell tumors (GCT) as well as malignant tumors of the distal radius. However, wrist reconstruction after en bloc resection of the distal radius represents a great challenge. Although several surgical techniques, either achieving a stable wrist by arthrodesis or reconstructing a flexible wrist by arthroplasty, have been reported, the optimal reconstruction procedure remains controversial. The purpose of this review was to investigate which reconstruction methods might be the best option by analyzing the indications, techniques, limitations, and problems of different reconstruction methods. With the advancement of imaging, surgical techniques and materials, some reconstruction techniques have been further refined. Each of the techniques discussed in this review has its advantages and disadvantages. Wrist arthrodesis seems to be preferred over wrist arthroplasty in terms of grip strength and longā€term complications, while wrist arthroplasty seems to be superior to wrist arthrodesis in terms of wrist motion. All things considered, wrist arthroplasty with a vascularized fibular head autograft might be a good option because of better wrist function, acceptable grip strength, and a relatively lower complication rate. Moreover, wrist arthrodesis is still an option if the fibular head autograft reconstruction fails. Orthopaedic oncologists should familiarize themselves with the characteristics of each technique to select the most appropriate reconstruction method depending on each patient's situation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17577861 and 17577853
Volume :
13
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Orthopaedic Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0287b492160b4b9d9dee99c556006616
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12737