Back to Search Start Over

Occurrence of and Reasons for 'Missing Events' in Mobile Dietary Assessments: Results From Three Event-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies

Authors :
Ziesemer, Katrin
König, Laura Maria
Boushey, Carol Jo
Villinger, Karoline
Wahl, Deborah Ronja
Butscher, Simon
Müller, Jens
Reiterer, Harald
Schupp, Harald Thomas
Renner, Britta
Source :
JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol 8, Iss 10, p e15430 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
JMIR Publications, 2020.

Abstract

BackgroundEstablishing a methodology for assessing nutritional behavior comprehensively and accurately poses a great challenge. Mobile technologies such as mobile image-based food recording apps enable eating events to be assessed in the moment in real time, thereby reducing memory biases inherent in retrospective food records. However, users might find it challenging to take images of the food they consume at every eating event over an extended period, which might lead to incomplete records of eating events (missing events). ObjectiveAnalyzing data from 3 studies that used mobile image-based food recording apps and varied in their technical enrichment, this study aims to assess how often eating events (meals and snacks) were missed over a period of 8 days in a naturalistic setting by comparing the number of recorded events with the number of normative expected events, over time, and with recollections of missing events. MethodsParticipants in 3 event-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) studies using mobile image-based dietary assessments were asked to record all eating events (study 1, N=38, 1070 eating events; study 2, N=35, 934 eating events; study 3, N=110, 3469 eating events). Study 1 used a basic app; study 2 included 1 fixed reminder and the possibility to add meals after the actual eating events occurred instead of in the moment (addendum); and study 3 included 2 fixed reminders, an addendum feature, and the option to record skipped meals. The number of recalled missed events and their reasons were assessed by semistructured interviews after the EMA period (studies 1 and 2) and daily questionnaires (study 3). ResultsOverall, 183 participants reported 5473 eating events. Although the momentary adherence rate as indexed by a comparison with normative expected events was generally high across all 3 studies, a differential pattern of results emerged with a higher rate of logged meals in the more technically intensive study 3. Multilevel models for the logging trajectories of reported meals in all 3 studies showed a significant, albeit small, decline over time (b=−.11 to −.14, Ps

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22915222
Volume :
8
Issue :
10
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.018c7fb1116141d1a1c1aa09ad7aa3b3
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2196/15430