Back to Search Start Over

Investigation of the performance of integrated intelligent models to predict the roughness of Ti6Al4V end-milled surface with uncoated cutting tool

Authors :
Al-Zubaidi Salah
Ghani Jaharah A.
Haron Che Hassan Che
Al-Tamimi Adnan Naji Jameel
Mohammed M. N.
Ruggiero Alessandro
Sarhan Samaher M.
Abdullah Oday I.
Salleh Mohd Shukor
Source :
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Vol 32, Iss 1, Pp 760-6 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
De Gruyter, 2023.

Abstract

Titanium alloys are broadly used in the medical and aerospace sectors. However, they are categorized within the hard-to-machine alloys ascribed to their higher chemical reactivity and lower thermal conductivity. This aim of this research was to study the impact of the dry-end-milling process with an uncoated tool on the produced surface roughness of Ti6Al4V alloy. This research aims to study the impact of the dry-end milling process with an uncoated tool on the produced surface roughness of Ti6Al4V alloy. Also, it seeks to develop a new hybrid neural model based on the training back propagation neural network (BPNN) with swarm optimization-gravitation search hybrid algorithms (PSO-GSA). Full-factorial design of the experiment with L27 orthogonal array was applied, and three end-milling parameters (cutting speed, feed rate, and axial depth of cut) with three levels were selected (50, 77.5, and 105 m/min; 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2 mm/tooth; and 1, 1.5, and 2 mm) and investigated to show their influence on the obtained surface roughness. The results revealed that the surface roughness is significantly affected by the feed rate followed by the axial depth. A 0.49 µm was produced as a minimum surface roughness at the optimized parameters of 105 m/min, 0.1 mm/tooth, and 1 mm. On the other hand, a neural network having a single hidden layer with 1–20 hidden neurons, 3 input neurons, and 1 output neuron was trained with both PSO and PSO–GSA algorithms. The hybrid BPNN–PSO–GSA model showed its superiority over the BPNN–PSO model in terms of the minimum mean square error (MSE) that was calculated during the testing stage. The best BPNN–PSO–GSA hybrid model was the 3–18–1 structure, which reached the best testing MSE of 3.8 × 10−11 against 2.42 × 10−5 of the 3–8–1 BPNN–PSO hybrid model.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21910243
Volume :
32
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.012e5be1d2e442a0bea7a2d04b93a30a
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0300