Sophia and poiesis : Nietzsche, aesthetics, and the quest for knowledge

In this study, it will be my concern to examine the argument for a discontinuity between Nietzsche's early and 'middle' period writings. Specifically, I will address the notion that these earlier works represent something that had, by 1878, become intolerable for Nietzsche: life-denial. The typical reading of The Birth of Tragedy presents it as a work of Schopenhauerian pessimism, which offers the art of beautifying illusion as the only possible means to escape the relentless horror of existence. Scholarship in the last 20 years has worked against this interpretation, and yet no scholar - perhaps with the exception of Michele Haar5 - has been able to fully endorse the claim made by Nietzsche in his 1886 preface to the work, "An Attempt at Self Criticism": that Birth offered aesthetics as a remedy to life-denial. It was in the name of opposing this ethos - which Nietzsche most famously aligned with Christian and Buddhist asceticism - that the Free Spirit works were to wage their war against metaphysics and to denounce the 'afterworldsmen' (Hinterweltlern) who turn their back on life and seek for meaning in the Beyond. Through a reading of Birth, as well as its draft texts - "The Dionysian Worldview" and "The Greek Music Drama"-, the works' proposed follow up Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks, and the lectures series this latter was based on (The Pre-Platonic Lectures) I will argue for an alternative interpretation. From a Naturalist reading of these early texts and their 'Aesthetic interpretation of Life', I seek to trace a line of continuity that extends into the Free Spirit works.