Back to Search Start Over

Multi-modal AI for comprehensive breast cancer prognostication

Authors :
Witowski, Jan
Zeng, Ken
Cappadona, Joseph
Elayoubi, Jailan
Chiru, Elena Diana
Chan, Nancy
Kang, Young-Joon
Howard, Frederick
Ostrovnaya, Irina
Fernandez-Granda, Carlos
Schnabel, Freya
Ozerdem, Ugur
Liu, Kangning
Steinsnyder, Zoe
Thakore, Nitya
Sadic, Mohammad
Yeung, Frank
Liu, Elisa
Hill, Theodore
Swett, Benjamin
Rigau, Danielle
Clayburn, Andrew
Speirs, Valerie
Vetter, Marcus
Sojak, Lina
Soysal, Simone Muenst
Baumhoer, Daniel
Choucair, Khalil
Zong, Yu
Daoud, Lina
Saad, Anas
Abdulsattar, Waleed
Beydoun, Rafic
Pan, Jia-Wern
Makmur, Haslina
Teo, Soo-Hwang
Pak, Linda Ma
Angel, Victor
Zilenaite-Petrulaitiene, Dovile
Laurinavicius, Arvydas
Klar, Natalie
Piening, Brian D.
Bifulco, Carlo
Jun, Sun-Young
Yi, Jae Pak
Lim, Su Hyun
Brufsky, Adam
Esteva, Francisco J.
Pusztai, Lajos
LeCun, Yann
Geras, Krzysztof J.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Treatment selection in breast cancer is guided by molecular subtypes and clinical characteristics. Recurrence risk assessment plays a crucial role in personalizing treatment. Current methods, including genomic assays, have limited accuracy and clinical utility, leading to suboptimal decisions for many patients. We developed a test for breast cancer patient stratification based on digital pathology and clinical characteristics using novel AI methods. Specifically, we utilized a vision transformer-based pan-cancer foundation model trained with self-supervised learning to extract features from digitized H&E-stained slides. These features were integrated with clinical data to form a multi-modal AI test predicting cancer recurrence and death. The test was developed and evaluated using data from a total of 8,161 breast cancer patients across 15 cohorts originating from seven countries. Of these, 3,502 patients from five cohorts were used exclusively for evaluation, while the remaining patients were used for training. Our test accurately predicted our primary endpoint, disease-free interval, in the five external cohorts (C-index: 0.71 [0.68-0.75], HR: 3.63 [3.02-4.37, p<0.01]). In a direct comparison (N=858), the AI test was more accurate than Oncotype DX, the standard-of-care 21-gene assay, with a C-index of 0.67 [0.61-0.74] versus 0.61 [0.49-0.73], respectively. Additionally, the AI test added independent information to Oncotype DX in a multivariate analysis (HR: 3.11 [1.91-5.09, p<0.01)]). The test demonstrated robust accuracy across all major breast cancer subtypes, including TNBC (C-index: 0.71 [0.62-0.81], HR: 3.81 [2.35-6.17, p=0.02]), where no diagnostic tools are currently recommended by clinical guidelines. These results suggest that our AI test can improve accuracy, extend applicability to a wider range of patients, and enhance access to treatment selection tools.

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2410.21256
Document Type :
Working Paper