Back to Search Start Over

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Chromatic Gaussian Process Noise Models for Six Pulsars

Authors :
Larsen, Bjorn
Mingarelli, Chiara M. F.
Hazboun, Jeffrey S.
Chalumeau, Aurelien
Good, Deborah C.
Simon, Joseph
Agazie, Gabriella
Anumarlapudi, Akash
Archibald, Anne M.
Arzoumanian, Zaven
Baker, Paul T.
Brook, Paul R.
Cromartie, H. Thankful
Crowter, Kathryn
DeCesar, Megan E.
Demorest, Paul B.
Dolch, Timothy
Ferrara, Elizabeth C.
Fiore, William
Fonseca, Emmanuel
Freedman, Gabriel E.
Garver-Daniels, Nate
Gentile, Peter A.
Glaser, Joseph
Jennings, Ross J.
Jones, Megan L.
Kaplan, David L.
Kerr, Matthew
Lam, Michael T.
Lorimer, Duncan R.
Luo, Jing
Lynch, Ryan S.
McEwen, Alexander
McLaughlin, Maura A.
McMann, Natasha
Meyers, Bradley W.
Ng, Cherry
Nice, David J.
Pennucci, Timothy T.
Perera, Benetge B. P.
Pol, Nihan S.
Radovan, Henri A.
Ransom, Scott M.
Ray, Paul S.
Schmiedekamp, Ann
Schmiedekamp, Carl
Shapiro-Albert, Brent J.
Stairs, Ingrid H.
Stovall, Kevin
Susobhanan, Abhimanyu
Swiggum, Joseph K.
Wahl, Haley M.
Champion, David J.
Cognard, Ismael
Guillemot, Lucas
Hu, Huanchen
Keith, Michael J.
Liu, Kuo
McKee, James W.
Parthasarathy, Aditya
Perrodin, Delphine
Possenti, Andrea
Shaifullah, Golam M.
Theureau, Gilles
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) are designed to detect low-frequency gravitational waves (GWs). GWs induce achromatic signals in PTA data, meaning that the timing delays do not depend on radio-frequency. However, pulse arrival times are also affected by radio-frequency dependent "chromatic" noise from sources such as dispersion measure (DM) and scattering delay variations. Furthermore, the characterization of GW signals may be influenced by the choice of chromatic noise model for each pulsar. To better understand this effect, we assess if and how different chromatic noise models affect achromatic noise properties in each pulsar. The models we compare include existing DM models used by NANOGrav and noise models used for the European PTA Data Release 2 (EPTA DR2). We perform this comparison using a subsample of six pulsars from the NANOGrav 15 yr data set, selecting the same six pulsars as from the EPTA DR2 six-pulsar dataset. We find that the choice of chromatic noise model noticeably affects the achromatic noise properties of several pulsars. This is most dramatic for PSR J1713+0747, where the amplitude of its achromatic red noise lowers from $\log_{10}A_{\text{RN}} = -14.1^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$ to $-14.7^{+0.3}_{-0.5}$, and the spectral index broadens from $\gamma_{\text{RN}} = 2.6^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ to $\gamma_{\text{RN}} = 3.5^{+1.2}_{-0.9}$. We also compare each pulsar's noise properties with those inferred from the EPTA DR2, using the same models. From the discrepancies, we identify potential areas where the noise models could be improved. These results highlight the potential for custom chromatic noise models to improve PTA sensitivity to GWs.

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2405.14941
Document Type :
Working Paper