Back to Search Start Over

Improving image quality of sparse-view lung tumor CT images with U-Net

Authors :
Ries, Annika
Dorosti, Tina
Thalhammer, Johannes
Sasse, Daniel
Sauter, Andreas
Meurer, Felix
Benne, Ashley
Lasser, Tobias
Pfeiffer, Franz
Schaff, Florian
Pfeiffer, Daniela
Source :
Eur Radiol Exp 8, 54 (2024)
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: We aimed at improving image quality (IQ) of sparse-view computed tomography (CT) images using a U-Net for lung metastasis detection and determining the best tradeoff between number of views, IQ, and diagnostic confidence. Methods: CT images from 41 subjects aged 62.8 $\pm$ 10.6 years (mean $\pm$ standard deviation), 23 men, 34 with lung metastasis, 7 healthy, were retrospectively selected (2016-2018) and forward projected onto 2,048-view sinograms. Six corresponding sparse-view CT data subsets at varying levels of undersampling were reconstructed from sinograms using filtered backprojection with 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, and 512 views. A dual-frame U-Net was trained and evaluated for each subsampling level on 8,658 images from 22 diseased subjects. A representative image per scan was selected from 19 subjects (12 diseased, 7 healthy) for a single-blinded multireader study. These slices, for all levels of subsampling, with and without U-Net postprocessing, were presented to three readers. IQ and diagnostic confidence were ranked using predefined scales. Subjective nodule segmentation was evaluated using sensitivity and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC); clustered Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. Results: The 64-projection sparse-view images resulted in 0.89 sensitivity and 0.81 DSC, while their counterparts, postprocessed with the U-Net, had improved metrics (0.94 sensitivity and 0.85 DSC) (p = 0.400). Fewer views led to insufficient IQ for diagnosis. For increased views, no substantial discrepancies were noted between sparse-view and postprocessed images. Conclusions: Projection views can be reduced from 2,048 to 64 while maintaining IQ and the confidence of the radiologists on a satisfactory level.

Details

Database :
arXiv
Journal :
Eur Radiol Exp 8, 54 (2024)
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2307.15506
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00450-4