Back to Search Start Over

$^{54}$Fe($d$,$p$)$^{55}$Fe and the evolution of single neutron energies in the $N=29$ isotones

Authors :
Riley, L. A.
Hay, I. C. S.
Baby, L. T.
Conley, A. L.
Cottle, P. D.
Esparza, J.
Hanselman, K.
Kelly, B.
Kemper, K. W.
Macon, K. T.
McCann, G. W.
Quirin, M. W.
Renom, R.
Saunders, R. L.
Spieker, M.
Wiedenhöver, I.
Source :
Phys. Rev. C 106, 064308 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

A measurement of the $^{54}$Fe($d$,$p$)$^{55}$Fe reaction at 16 MeV was performed using the Florida State University Super-Enge Split-Pole Spectrograph to determine single-neutron energies for the $2p_{3/2}$, $2p_{1/2}$, $1f_{5/2}$, $1g_{9/2}$ and $2d_{5/2}$ orbits. Two states were observed that had not been observed in previous (d, p) measurements. In addition, we made angular momentum transfer, \textit{L}, assignments to four states and changed \textit{L} assignments from previous ($d$, $p$) measurements for nine more states. The spin-orbit splitting between the $2p_{3/2}$ and $2p_{1/2}$ orbits is similar to that in the other $N=29$ isotones and not close to zero as a previous measurement suggested. While the $1f_{5/2}$ single neutron energy is significantly lower in $^{55}$Fe than in $^{51}$Ti, as predicted by a covariant density functional theory calculation, the single-neutron energy for this orbit in $^{55}$Fe is more than 1 MeV higher than the calculation suggests, although it is only 400 keV above the $2p_{1/2}$ orbit. The summed spectroscopic strength we observed for the $1g_{9/2}$ orbit up to the single-neutron separation energy of 9.3 MeV is only 0.3. This is surprising because the $1g_{9/2}$ orbit is predicted by Togashi \textit{et al.} to be located only 5.5 MeV above the $2p_{3/2}$ orbit.<br />Comment: 16 pages, 6 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2106.05781

Subjects

Subjects :
Nuclear Experiment

Details

Database :
arXiv
Journal :
Phys. Rev. C 106, 064308 (2022)
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2212.04384
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.064308