Back to Search Start Over

Transient obscuration event captured in NGC~3227 II. Warm absorbers and obscuration events in archival XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations

Authors :
Wang, Yijun
Kaastra, Jelle
Mehdipour, Missagh
Mao, Junjie
Costantini, Elisa
Kriss, Gerard A.
Pinto, Ciro
Ponti, Gabriele
Behar, Ehud
Bianchi, Stefano
Branduardi-Raymont, Graziella
De Marco, Barbara
Grafton-Waters, Sam
Petrucci, Pierre-Olivier
Ebrero, Jacobo
Walton, Dominic James
Kaspi, Shai
Xue, Yongquan
Paltani, Stéphane
di Gesu, Laura
He, Zhicheng
Source :
A&A 657, A77 (2022)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The relation between warm absorber (WA) outflows of AGN and nuclear obscuration activities caused by optically-thick clouds (obscurers) crossing the line of sight is unclear. NGC 3227 is a suitable target to study the properties of both WAs and obscurers, because it matches the following selection criteria: WAs in both ultraviolet (UV) and X-rays, suitably variable, bright in UV and X-rays, good archival spectra for comparing with the obscured spectra. To investigate WAs and obscurers of NGC~3227, we used a broadband spectral-energy-distribution model built in our Paper I and the photoionization code of SPEX software to fit archival XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations in 2006 and 2016. Using unobscured observations, we find four WAs with different ionization states (log$\xi$ [erg cm/s]~-1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0). The highest-ionization WA has a higher hydrogen column density (~$10^{22}$/cm$^2$) than the other three WAs (~$10^{21}$/cm$^2$). Their outflow velocities range from 100 to 1300 km/s, and show a positive correlation with the ionization parameter. These WAs are estimated to be between the outer broad-line-region (BLR) and the narrow line region. Besides, we find an X-ray obscuration event in 2006, which was missed by previous studies. It can be explained by a single obscurer. We also study the previously published obscuration event in 2016, which needs two obscurers in the fit. A high-ionization obscurer (log$\xi$~2.80; covering factor $C_f$~30%) only appears in 2016, which has a high column density (~$10^{23}$/cm$^2$). A low-ionization obscurer (log$\xi$~1.0-1.9; $C_f$~20%-50%) exists in both 2006 and 2016, which has a lower column density (~$10^{22}$/cm$^2$). These obscurers are estimated to be in the BLR by their crossing time of transverse motions. The obscurers and WAs of NGC 3227 have different distances and number densities, which indicate that they might have different origins.<br />Comment: 12 pages, 6 figures, 6 tables; accepted by A&A

Details

Database :
arXiv
Journal :
A&A 657, A77 (2022)
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2110.07861
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141599