Back to Search Start Over

HD 165054: an astrometric calibration field for high-contrast imagers in Baade's Window

Authors :
Nguyen, Meiji M.
De Rosa, Robert J.
Wang, Jason J.
Esposito, Thomas M.
Kalas, Paul
Graham, James R.
Macintosh, Bruce
Bailey, Vanessa P.
Barman, Travis
Bulger, Joanna
Chilcote, Jeffrey
Cotten, Tara
Doyon, Rene
Duchêne, Gaspard
Fitzgerald, Michael P.
Follette, Katherine B.
Gerard, Benjamin L.
Goodsell, Stephen J.
Greenbaum, Alexandra Z.
Hibon, Pascale
Hom, Justin
Hung, Li-Wei
Ingraham, Patrick
Konopacky, Quinn
Larkin, James E.
Maire, Jérôme
Marchis, Franck
Marley, Mark S.
Marois, Christian
Metchev, Stanimir
Millar-Blanchaer, Maxwell A.
Nielsen, Eric L.
Oppenheimer, Rebecca
Palmer, David
Patience, Jennifer
Perrin, Marshall
Poyneer, Lisa
Pueyo, Laurent
Rajan, Abhijith
Rameau, Julien
Rantakyrö, Fredrik T.
Ren, Bin
Ruffio, Jean-Baptiste
Savransky, Dmitry
Schneider, Adam C.
Sivaramakrishnan, Anand
Song, Inseok
Soummer, Remi
Tallis, Melisa
Thomas, Sandrine
Wallace, J. Kent
Ward-Duong, Kimberly
Wiktorowicz, Sloane
Wolff, Schuyler
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

We present a study of the HD 165054 astrometric calibration field that has been periodically observed with the Gemini Planet Imager. HD 165054 is a bright star within Baade's Window, a region of the galactic plane with relatively low extinction from interstellar dust. HD 165054 was selected as a calibrator target due to the high number density of stars within this region ($\sim 3$ stars per square arcsecond with $H<22$), necessary because of the small field-of-view of the Gemini Planet Imager. Using nine epochs spanning over five years, we have fit a standard five-parameter astrometric model to the astrometry of seven background stars within close proximity to HD 165054 (angular separation $< 2$ arcsec). We achieved a proper motion precision of $\sim 0.3$ mas/yr, and constrained the parallax of each star to be $\lesssim 1$ mas. Our measured proper motions and parallax limits are consistent with the background stars being a part of the galactic bulge. Using these measurements we find no evidence of any systematic trend of either the plate scale or the north angle offset of GPI between 2014 and 2019. We compared our model describing the motions of the seven background stars to observations of the same field in 2014 and 2018 obtained with Keck/NIRC2, an instrument with an excellent astrometric calibration. We find that predicted position of the background sources is consistent with that measured by NIRC2, within the uncertainties of the calibration of the two instruments. In the future, we will use this field as a standard astrometric calibrator for the upgrade of GPI and potentially for other high-contrast imagers.<br />Comment: 25 pages, 12 figures

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.2004.02923
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab86aa