Data Collection versus Data Estimation: A Fundamental Trade-off in Dynamic Networks

An important question that often arises in the operation of networked systems is whether to collect the real-time data or to estimate them based on the previously collected data. Various factors should be taken into account such as how informative the data are at each time instant for state estimation, how costly and credible the collected data are, and how rapidly the data vary with time. The above question can be formulated as a dynamic decision making problem with imperfect information structure, where a decision maker wishes to find an efficient way to switch between data collection and data estimation while the quality of the estimation depends on the previously collected data (i.e., duality effect). In this paper, the evolution of the state of each node is modeled as an exchangeable Markov process for discrete features and equivariant linear system for continuous features, where the data of interest are defined in the former case as the empirical distribution of the states, and in the latter case as the weighted average of the states. When the data are collected, they may or may not be credible, according to a Bernoulli distribution. Based on a novel planning space, a Bellman equation is proposed to identify a near-optimal strategy. A reinforcement learning algorithm is developed for the case when the model is not known exactly, and its convergence to the near-optimal solution is shown subsequently. In addition, a certainty threshold is introduced that determines when data estimation is more desirable than data collection, as the number of nodes increases. For the special case of linear dynamics, a separation principle is constructed wherein the optimal estimate is computed by a Kalman-like filter, irrespective of the probability distribution of random variables...
Comment: IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 16 pages