Back to Search Start Over

Towards FAIR protocols and workflows: The OpenPREDICT case study

Authors :
Celebi, Remzi
Moreira, Joao Rebelo
Hassan, Ahmed A.
Ayyar, Sandeep
Ridder, Lars
Kuhn, Tobias
Dumontier, Michel
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

It is essential for the advancement of science that scientists and researchers share, reuse and reproduce workflows and protocols used by others. The FAIR principles are a set of guidelines that aim to maximize the value and usefulness of research data, and emphasize a number of important points regarding the means by which digital objects are found and reused by others. The question of how to apply these principles not just to the static input and output data but also to the dynamic workflows and protocols that consume and produce them is still under debate and poses a number of challenges. In this paper we describe our inclusive and overarching approach to apply the FAIR principles to workflows and protocols and demonstrate its benefits. We apply and evaluate our approach on a case study that consists of making the PREDICT workflow, a highly cited drug repurposing workflow, open and FAIR. This includes FAIRification of the involved datasets, as well as applying semantic technologies to represent and store data about the detailed versions of the general protocol, of the concrete workflow instructions, and of their execution traces. A semantic model was proposed to better address these specific requirements and were evaluated by answering competency questions. This semantic model consists of classes and relations from a number of existing ontologies, including Workflow4ever, PROV, EDAM, and BPMN. This allowed us then to formulate and answer new kinds of competency questions. Our evaluation shows the high degree to which our FAIRified OpenPREDICT workflow now adheres to the FAIR principles and the practicality and usefulness of being able to answer our new competency questions.<br />Comment: Preprint. Submitted to PeerJ on 13th November 2019. 3 appendixes as PDF files

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.1911.09531
Document Type :
Working Paper