Back to Search Start Over

The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VII. The Distance to M101 via the Optical Tip of the Red Giant Branch Method

Authors :
Beaton, Rachael L.
Seibert, Mark
Hatt, Dylan
Freedman, Wendy L.
Hoyt, Taylor J.
Jang, In Sung
Lee, Myung Gyoon
Madore, Barry F.
Monson, Andrew J.
Neeley, Jillian R.
Rich, Jeffrey A.
Scowcroft, Victoria
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program (CCHP) is building a direct path to the Hubble constant (H0) using Population II stars as the calibrator of the SN Ia-based distance scale. This path to calibrate the SN Ia is independent of the systematics in the traditional Cepheid-based technique. In this paper, we present the distance to M101, the host to SN2011fe, using the I-band tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) based on observations from the ACS/WFC instrument on the Hubble Space Telescope. The CCHP targets the halo of M101 where there is little to no host-galaxy dust, the red giant branch is isolated from nearly all other stellar populations, and there is virtually no source confusion or crowding at the magnitude of the tip. Applying the standard procedure for the TRGB method from the other works in the CCHP series, we find a foreground-extinction-corrected M101 distance modulus of {\mu_0}=29.07+/-0.04(stat)+/-0.05(sys) mag, which corresponds to a distance of D=6.52+/-0.12(stat)+/-0.15(sys) Mpc. This result is consistent with several recent Cepheid-based determinations, suggesting agreement between Population I and II distance scales for this nearby SN Ia-host galaxy. We further analyze four archival datasets for M101 that have targeted its outer disk to argue that targeting in the stellar halo provides much more reliable distance measurements from the TRGB method due to the combination of multiple structural components and heavily population contamination. Application of the TRGB in complex regions will have sources of uncertainty not accounted for in commonly used uncertainty measurement techniques.<br />Comment: 30 Pages, 12 Figures, 4 Tables; Figure quality degraded for ArXiv posting; Accepted to ApJ. Note this version corrects an error regarding a previous study, which is indicated in the text

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.1908.06120
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4263