Back to Search Start Over

The late-time afterglow evolution of long gamma-ray bursts GRB 160625B and GRB 160509A

Authors :
Kangas, Tuomas
Fruchter, Andrew S.
Cenko, S. Bradley
Corsi, Alessandra
Postigo, Antonio de Ugarte
Pe'er, Asaf
Vogel, Stuart N.
Cucchiara, Antonino
Gompertz, Benjamin
Graham, John
Levan, Andrew
Misra, Kuntal
Perley, Daniel A.
Racusin, Judith
Tanvir, Nial
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

We present post-jet-break \textit{HST}, VLA and \textit{Chandra} observations of the afterglow of the long $\gamma$-ray bursts GRB 160625B (between 69 and 209 days) and GRB 160509A (between 35 and 80 days). We calculate the post-jet-break decline rates of the light curves, and find the afterglow of GRB 160625B inconsistent with a simple $t^{-3/4}$ steepening over the break, expected from the geometric effect of the jet edge entering our line of sight. However, the favored optical post-break decline ($f_{\nu} \propto t^{-1.96 \pm 0.07}$) is also inconsistent with the $f_{\nu} \propto t^{-p}$ decline (where $p \approx 2.3$ from the pre-break light curve), which is expected from exponential lateral expansion of the jet; perhaps suggesting lateral expansion that only affects a fraction of the jet. The post-break decline of GRB 160509A is consistent with both the $t^{-3/4}$ steepening and with $f_{\nu} \propto t^{-p}$. We also use {\sc boxfit} to fit afterglow models to both light curves and find both to be energetically consistent with a millisecond magnetar central engine, although the magnetar parameters need to be extreme (i.e. $E \sim 3 \times 10^{52}$ erg). Finally, the late-time radio light curves of both afterglows are not reproduced well by {\sc boxfit} and are inconsistent with predictions from the standard jet model; instead both are well represented by a single power law decline (roughly $f_{\nu} \propto t^{-1}$) with no breaks. This requires a highly chromatic jet break ($t_{j,\mathrm{radio}} > 10 \times t_{j,\mathrm{optical}}$) and possibly a two-component jet for both bursts.<br />Comment: 19 pages, 9 figures. Revised version; accepted for publication in ApJ

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.1906.03493
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab8799