How Confinement-Induced Structures Alter the Contribution of Hydrodynamic and Short-Ranged Repulsion Forces to the Viscosity of Colloidal Suspensions

Understanding the correlation between structure and rheology in colloidal suspensions is important as these suspensions are crucial in industrial applications. Moreover, colloids exhibit a wide range of structures under confinement that could considerably alter the viscosity. Here, we use a combination of experiments and simulations to elucidate how confinement induced structures alter the relative contributions of hydrodynamic and repulsive forces to produce up to a ten fold change in the viscosity. We use a custom built confocal rheoscope to image the particle configurations of a colloidal suspension while simultaneously measuring the viscosity. We find a non-monotonic trend to the viscosity under confinement that is strongly correlated with the microstructure. As the gap decreases below 15 particle diameters, the viscosity first decreases from its bulk value, shows fluctuations with the gap, and then sharply increases for gaps below three particle diameters. Further, we compare our experimental results to two simulations techniques that enables us to determine the relative contributions of hydrodynamic and short range repulsive stresses. The first method uses the lubrication approximation to find the hydrodynamic stress and includes a short range repulsive force between the particles and the second is a Stokesian dynamics simulation that calculates the full hydrodynamic stress in the suspension. We find that the decrease in the viscosity at moderate confinements has a significant contribution from both the hydrodynamic and repulsive forces whereas the increase in viscosity at gaps less than three particle diameters arises primarily from short range repulsive forces. These results provide new insights to the unique rheological behavior of confined suspensions and further enable us to tune the viscosity by changing properties such as the gap, polydispersity, and the volume fraction.
Comment: 15 pages, 10 figures