Back to Search Start Over

Selecting M-giants with infra-red photometry: Distances, metallicities and the Sagittarius stream

Authors :
Li, Jing
Smith, Martin C.
Zhong, Jing
Hou, Jinliang
Carlin, Jeffrey L.
Newberg, Heidi Jo
Liu, Chao
Chen, Li
Li, Linlin
Shao, Zhengyi
Small, Emma
Tian, Hao
Source :
ApJ 823 59 (2016)
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Using a spectroscopically confirmed sample of M-giants, M-dwarfs and quasars from the LAMOST survey, we assess how well WISE $\&$ 2MASS color-cuts can be used to select M-giant stars. The WISE bands are very efficient at separating M-giants from M-dwarfs and we present a simple classification that can produce a clean and relatively complete sample of M-giants. We derive a new photometric relation to estimate the metallicity for M-giants, calibrated using data from the APOGEE survey. We find a strong correlation between the $(W1-W2)$ color and $\rm [M/H]$, where almost all of the scatter is due to photometric uncertainties. We show that previous photometric distance relations, which are mostly based on stellar models, may be biased and devise a new empirical distance relation, investigating trends with metallicity and star formation history. Given these relations, we investigate the properties of M-giants in the Sagittarius stream. The offset in the orbital plane between the leading and trailing tails is reproduced and, by identifying distant M-giants in the direction of the Galactic anti-center, we confirm that the previously detected debris in the outer halo is the apocenter of the trailing tail. We also find tentative evidence supporting an existing overdensity near the leading tail in the Northern Galactic hemisphere, possibly an extension to the trailing tail (so-called Branch C). We have measured the metallicity distribution along the stream, finding a clear metallicity offset between the leading and trailing tails, in agreement with models for the stream formation. We include an online table of M-giants to facilitate further studies.<br />Comment: 15 pages, 13 figures, accepted by ApJ. Minor issue fixed with Fig 12 and Section 5.3

Details

Database :
arXiv
Journal :
ApJ 823 59 (2016)
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.1603.00262
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/59