Back to Search Start Over

Pluto's atmosphere from stellar occultations in 2012 and 2013

Authors :
Dias-Oliveira, A.
Sicardy, B.
Lellouch, E.
Vieira-Martins, R.
Assafin, M.
Camargo, J. I. B.
Braga-Ribas, F.
Gomes-Júnior, A. R.
Benedetti-Rossi, G.
Colas, F.
Decock, A.
Doressoundiram, A.
Dumas, C.
Emilio, M.
Polleri, J. Fabrega
Gil-Hutton, R.
Gillon, M.
Girard, J.
Hau, G.
Ivanov, V. D.
Jehin, E.
Lecacheux, J.
Leiva, R.
Lopez-Sisterna, C.
Mancini, L.
Maury, A.
Meza, E.
Morales, N.
Nagy, L.
Opitom, C.
Ortiz, J. L.
Pollock, J.
Roques, F.
Snodgrass, C.
Soulier, J. F.
Thirouin, A.
Vanzi, L.
Widemann, T.
Reichart, D. E.
LaCluyze, A. P.
Haislip, J. B.
Ivarsen, K. M.
Dominik, M.
Jørgensen, U.
Skottfelt, J.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

We analyze two multi-chord stellar occultations by Pluto observed on July 18th, 2012 and May 4th, 2013, and monitored respectively from five and six sites. They provide a total of fifteen light-curves, twelve of them being used for a simultaneous fit that uses a unique temperature profile, assuming a clear (no-haze) and pure N_2 atmosphere, but allowing for a possible pressure variation between the two dates. We find a solution that fits satisfactorily (i.e. within the noise level) all the twelve light-curves, providing atmospheric constraints between ~1,190 km (pressure ~ 11 \mubar) and ~ 1,450 km (pressure ~0.1 \mubar) from Pluto's center. Our main results are: (1) the best-fitting temperature profile shows a stratosphere with strong positive gradient between 1,190 km (at 36 K, 11 \mubar) and r = 1,215 km (6.0 \mubar), where a temperature maximum of 110 K is reached; above it is a mesosphere with negative thermal gradient of -0.2 K/km up to ~ 1,390 km (0.25 \mubar), where, the mesosphere connects itself to a more isothermal upper branch around 81 K; (2) the pressure shows a small (6 %) but significant increase (6-\sigma level) between the two dates; (3) without troposphere, Pluto's radius is found to be R_P = 1,190 +/- 5km. Allowing for a troposphere, R_P is constrained to lie between 1,168 and 1,195 km; (4) the currently measured CO abundance is too small to explain the mesospheric negative thermal gradient. Cooling by HCN is possible, but only if this species is largely saturated; Alternative explanations like zonal winds or vertical compositional variations of the atmosphere are unable to explain the observed mesospheric trend.<br />Comment: 41 pages, 13 figures, 4 tables

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.1506.08173
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/53