Back to Search
Start Over
Glueball Decay Rates in the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto Model
- Source :
- Phys. Rev. D 91, 106002 (2015)
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- We revisit and extend previous calculations of glueball decay rates in the Sakai-Sugimoto model, a holographic top-down approach for QCD with chiral quarks based on D8 probe branes in Witten's holographic model of nonsupersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. The rates for decays into two pions, two vector mesons, four pions, and the strongly suppressed decay into four pi0 are worked out quantitatively, using a range of the 't Hooft coupling which closely reproduces the decay rate of rho and omega mesons and also leads to a gluon condensate consistent with QCD sum rule calculations. The lowest holographic glueball, which arises from a rather exotic polarization of gravitons in the supergravity background, turns out to have a significantly lower mass and larger width than the two widely discussed glueball candidates f0(1500) and f0(1710). The lowest nonexotic and predominantly dilatonic scalar mode, which has a mass of 1487 MeV in the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model, instead provides a narrow glueball state, and we conjecture that only this nonexotic mode should be identified with a scalar glueball component of f0(1500) or f0(1710). Moreover the decay pattern of the tensor glueball is determined, which is found to have a comparatively broad total width when its mass is adjusted to around or above 2 GeV.<br />Comment: 38 pages, 5 figures, 9 tables; v2: minor corrections (numerical data in tables 3, 5, and 7 on excited scalar glueballs), 2 footnotes and 2 references added; v3: corrections in table 9 (extrapolations of tensor glueball decay to masses above 2 GeV)
- Subjects :
- High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
High Energy Physics - Theory
Nuclear Theory
Subjects
Details
- Database :
- arXiv
- Journal :
- Phys. Rev. D 91, 106002 (2015)
- Publication Type :
- Report
- Accession number :
- edsarx.1501.07906
- Document Type :
- Working Paper
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.106002