Back to Search Start Over

Herschel PEP: The star-formation rates of 1.5<z<2.5 massive galaxies

Authors :
Nordon, R.
Lutz, D.
Shao, L.
Magnelli, B.
Berta, S.
Altieri, B.
Andreani, P.
Aussel, H.
Bongiovanni, A.
Cava, A.
Cepa, J.
Cimatti, A.
Daddi, E.
Dominguez, H.
Elbaz, D.
Schreiber, N. M. Forster
Genzel, R.
Grazian, A.
Magdis, G.
Maiolino, R.
Garcia, A. M. Perez
Poglitsch, A.
Popesso, P.
Pozzi, F.
Riguccini, L.
Rodighiero, G.
Saintonge, A.
Sanchez-Portal, M.
Santini, P.
Sturm, E.
Tacconi, L.
Valtchanov, I.
Wetzstein, M.
Wieprecht, E.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

The star formation rate (SFR) is a key parameter in the study of galaxy evolution. The accuracy of SFR measurements at z~2 has been questioned following a disagreement between observations and theoretical models. The latter predict SFRs at this redshift that are typically a factor 4 or more lower than the measurements. We present star-formation rates based on calorimetric measurements of the far-infrared (FIR) luminosities for massive 1.5&lt;z&lt;2.5, normal star-forming galaxies (SFGs), which do not depend on extinction corrections and/or extrapolations of spectral energy distributions. The measurements are based on observations in GOODS-N with the Photodetector Array Camera &amp; Spectrometer (PACS) onboard Herschel, as part of the PACS Evolutionary Probe (PEP) project, that resolve for the first time individual SFGs at these redshifts at FIR wavelengths. We compare FIR-based SFRs to the more commonly used 24 micron and UV SFRs. We find that SFRs from 24 micron alone are higher by a factor of ~4-7.5 than the true SFRs. This overestimation depends on luminosity: gradually increasing for log L(24um)&gt;12.2 L_sun. The SFGs and AGNs tend to exhibit the same 24 micron excess. The UV SFRs are in closer agreement with the FIR-based SFRs. Using a Calzetti UV extinction correction results in a mean excess of up to 0.3 dex and a scatter of 0.35 dex from the FIR SFRs. The previous UV SFRs are thus confirmed and the mean excess, while narrowing the gap, is insufficient to explain the discrepancy between the observed SFRs and simulation predictions.&lt;br /&gt;Comment: Accepted for publication in the A&amp;A Herschel first results special issue. v2 Correction to the meta data only

Details

Database :
arXiv
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsarx.1005.1074
Document Type :
Working Paper
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014621