Back to Search Start Over

Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The SORT OUT IV Trial)

Authors :
Jensen, Lisette Okkels
Thayssen, Per
Hansen, Henrik Steen
Christiansen, Evald Høj
Tilsted, Hans-Henrik
Krusell, Lars Romer
Villadsen, Anton Boel
Junker, Anders
Hansen, Knud Nørregaard
Kaltoft, Anne
Maeng, Michael
Pedersen, Knud Erik
Kristensen, Steen Dalby
Bøtker, Hans Erik
Ravkilde, Jan
Sanchez, Richardo
Aarøe, Jens
Madsen, Morten
Sørensen, Henrik Toft
Thuesen, Leif
Lassen, Jens Flensted
Source :
Jensen, L O, Thayssen, P, Hansen, H S, Christiansen, E H, Tilsted, H-H, Krusell, L R, Villadsen, A B, Junker, A, Hansen, K N, Kaltoft, A, Maeng, M, Pedersen, K E, Kristensen, S D, Bøtker, H E, Ravkilde, J, Sanchez, R, Aarøe, J, Madsen, M, Sørensen, H T, Thuesen, L & Lassen, J F 2012, ' Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The SORT OUT IV Trial) ', Circulation, pp. 1246-55 . https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.063644
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among drug-eluting stents released to date, the sirolimus-eluting stent has demonstrated the least amount of late lumen loss, but its efficacy and safety have not been compared head-to-head with the next-generation everolimus-eluting stent. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome IV trial was a randomized multicenter, single-blind, all-comer, two-arm, non-inferiority trial comparing the everolimus-eluting stent with the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. The primary end point was a composite of safety (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis) and efficacy (target vessel revascularization) parameters. The non-inferiority criterion was a risk difference of 0.015. Intention-to-treat analyses were done at 9-month and 18-month follow-up. 1,390 patients were assigned to receive the everolimus-eluting stent, and 1,384 patients were assigned to receive the sirolimus-eluting stent. At 9-month follow-up, 68 [4.9%] patients treated with the everolimus-eluting stent versus 72 [5.2%] patients treated with the sirolimus-eluting stent experienced the primary end point (hazard ratio (HR) =0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.31) (p for non-inferiority=0.01). At 18-month follow-up, this differential remained: 99 [7.2%] patients treated with the everolimus-eluting stent versus 105 [7.6%] (HR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.71-1.23). At 9-month follow-up, rate of definite stent thrombosis was higher in the sirolimus-eluting group (2 [0.1%] patients versus 9 [0.7%] patients, (HR=0.22, 95% CI:0.05-1.02)).At 18-monthfollow-up, this difference was sustained (3 [0.2%] patients versus 12 [0.9%] patients; (HR=0.25, 95% CI:0.07-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The everolimus-eluting stent was found to be non-inferior to the sirolimus-eluting stent. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00552877.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Jensen, L O, Thayssen, P, Hansen, H S, Christiansen, E H, Tilsted, H-H, Krusell, L R, Villadsen, A B, Junker, A, Hansen, K N, Kaltoft, A, Maeng, M, Pedersen, K E, Kristensen, S D, Bøtker, H E, Ravkilde, J, Sanchez, R, Aarøe, J, Madsen, M, Sørensen, H T, Thuesen, L & Lassen, J F 2012, ' Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The SORT OUT IV Trial) ', Circulation, pp. 1246-55 . https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.063644
Accession number :
edsair.pure.au.......59a1428e1b840de682152854c70610b1