Back to Search
Start Over
Intraretinal foreign bodies: Surgical techniques and outcomes
- Source :
- Scopus-Elsevier, Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, Vol 8, Iss 4, Pp 330-336 (2013)
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To report the clinical features of eyes with intraretinal foreign bodies (IRFBs) and to evaluate the results of surgical management in these eyes. Methods: Hospital records of 34 eyes of 33 patients with IRFBs were reviewed. All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy to remove the foreign bodies using intraocular forceps or by magnetic extraction. Results: All patients were male with mean age of 2812.3 years and were followed for a mean period of 24.52.3 months. The IRFBs were ferromagnetic in 29 (85.3%) cases and were removed using an external magnet in 13 eyes (38.4%) or intraocular forceps in 21 eyes (61.6%). Laser photocoagulation was performed around the IRFB prior to surgery in 7 (20.6%) eyes. Macular pucker and scars developed in 8 (23.5%) eyes and retinal breaks posterior to the sclerotomy were formed in 12 eyes (35.3%) postoperatively. Final visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 12 (35.3%) eyes and 20/200 or better in 23 (67.7%) eyes. Final visual acuity of 20/200 or better had no significant relationship with the site, size, or type of the IRFB or with the interval from trauma to surgery. Conclusion: Despite the complexity of surgical management of IRFBs, anatomic and visual outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in these cases are generally good. The appropriate route of removal may be determined by the type, size, and site of the IRFB. Removal of magnetic IRFBs using external magnets versus intraocular forceps seems to entail comparable results.
Details
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Scopus-Elsevier, Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, Vol 8, Iss 4, Pp 330-336 (2013)
- Accession number :
- edsair.pmid.dedup....e8bb31aa6150598427efd210c9c1e33f