Comparative study of three different supraglottic airway devices in simulated difficult airway situations

MLA

Thierbach A, et al. “Comparative Study of Three Different Supraglottic Airway Devices in Simulated Difficult Airway Situations.” Minerva Anestesiologica, vol. 81, no. 12, Jan. 2015. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.pmid.dedup....c3c934eecb2f656d6feb89c04fb7712c&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

Thierbach A, Piepho T, Göbler S, Rützler K, Frass M, Ad, K., & Robak O. (2015). Comparative study of three different supraglottic airway devices in simulated difficult airway situations. Minerva Anestesiologica, 81(12).

Chicago

Thierbach A, Piepho T, Göbler S, Rützler K, Frass M, Kaye Ad, and Robak O. 2015. “Comparative Study of Three Different Supraglottic Airway Devices in Simulated Difficult Airway Situations.” Minerva Anestesiologica 81 (12). http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.pmid.dedup....c3c934eecb2f656d6feb89c04fb7712c&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.