[Percutaneous transcatheter treatment of pulmonary embolism: results of the SICI-GISE national survey promoted by the GISE-Young Committee]

Pulmonary embolism (PE) represents the third leading acute cardiovascular syndrome in the world and it is burdened with high mortality and morbidity rates. Percutaneous or catheter-based treatments of high- and intermediate-risk patients have garnered interest because of the limitations of both systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation strategies. However, data on these techniques are heterogeneous and limited to small non-randomized evidences.This survey was jointly performed by the GISE Young Committee with the support of the SICI-GISE Society and ICOT group with the aim of evaluating the view of the cardiology community on interventional therapies for PE. A web-based questionnaire based on 19 questions was distributed to SICI-GISE and ICOT members.The survey was distributed to 1550 physicians with 220 (14%) responses, 65% from North Italy. Multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for patients with PE were not available in most centers (56%), and transcatheter treatment was available in 55% of centers, most of them at low volume (5 percutaneous treatments/year). Among the devices used, mechanical thrombectomy was the predominant one (62%) in the absence of significant differences in the availability of devices within the three Italian geographic macro-areas. Respondents recognize the theoretical benefits of percutaneous treatment of PE, including: improving a prompt hemodynamic stabilization and respiratory exchange (89%) in high-risk patients, avoiding hemodynamic deterioration (39%) and right ventricular dysfunction (51%) in intermediate-risk patients, and reducing hemorrhagic complications related to systemic thrombolysis (36%). According to participants' judgement, the main factors limiting the use of percutaneous transcatheter treatment of PE in clinical practice are the lack of specific operator training (60%), lack of solid clinical data to support it (39%), difficult patient selection (34%), high costs (30%), and risk of procedural complications (26%).Currently, transcatheter treatment of PE appears to be widely supported but poorly used in clinical practice. Solid evidences are needed regarding the safety and efficacy profile of the different available devices, the identification of patient selection criteria, alongside the enhancement of the availability of techniques and technologies.