Back to Search Start Over

31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy in skeletal muscle: Experts' consensus recommendations

Authors :
Meyerspeer, Martin
Boesch, Chris
Cameron, Donnie
Dezortová, Monika
Forbes, Sean C.
Heerschap, Arend
Jeneson, Jeroen A.L.
Kan, Hermien E.
Kent, Jane
Layec, Gwenaël
Prompers, Jeanine J.
Reyngoudt, Harmen
Sleigh, Alison
Valkovič, Ladislav
Kemp, Graham J.
Baligand, Céline
Carlier, Pierre G.
Chatel, Benjamin
Damon, Bruce
Heskamp, Linda
Hájek, Milan
Jooijmans, Melissa
Krssak, Martin
Reichenbach, Juergen
Schmid, Albrecht
Slade, Jill
Vandenborne, Krista
Walter, Glenn A.
Willis, David
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Source :
NMR in biomedicine. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Nmr in Biomedicine, NMR in Biomedicine, 34, 5, NMR in Biomedicine, 34
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Skeletal muscle phosphorus‐31 31P MRS is the oldest MRS methodology to be applied to in vivo metabolic research. The technical requirements of 31P MRS in skeletal muscle depend on the research question, and to assess those questions requires understanding both the relevant muscle physiology, and how 31P MRS methods can probe it. Here we consider basic signal‐acquisition parameters related to radio frequency excitation, TR, TE, spectral resolution, shim and localisation. We make specific recommendations for studies of resting and exercising muscle, including magnetisation transfer, and for data processing. We summarise the metabolic information that can be quantitatively assessed with 31P MRS, either measured directly or derived by calculations that depend on particular metabolic models, and we give advice on potential problems of interpretation. We give expected values and tolerable ranges for some measured quantities, and minimum requirements for reporting acquisition parameters and experimental results in publications. Reliable examination depends on a reproducible setup, standardised preconditioning of the subject, and careful control of potential difficulties, and we summarise some important considerations and potential confounders. Our recommendations include the quantification and standardisation of contraction intensity, and how best to account for heterogeneous muscle recruitment. We highlight some pitfalls in the assessment of mitochondrial function by analysis of phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery kinetics. Finally, we outline how complementary techniques (near‐infrared spectroscopy, arterial spin labelling, BOLD and various other MRI and 1H MRS measurements) can help in the physiological/metabolic interpretation of 31P MRS studies by providing information about blood flow and oxygen delivery/utilisation. Our recommendations will assist in achieving the fullest possible reliable picture of muscle physiology and pathophysiology.<br />31P MRS can usefully probe skeletal muscle cellular energy metabolism. Choice of methodology depends on the research question. The recommendations given here will help researchers experienced in general MRS with the application of 31P MRS in skeletal muscle, covering the practicalities of data acquisition and muscle exercise as well as the physiological interpretation of the measurements. We also give expected values and tolerable ranges for some measured quantities, and minimum requirements for reporting results and acquisition parameters.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09523480
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
NMR in biomedicine. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Nmr in Biomedicine, NMR in Biomedicine, 34, 5, NMR in Biomedicine, 34
Accession number :
edsair.pmid.dedup....8dfd7c8ce5e375bb85511126aca3b8b2