Back to Search Start Over

Contemporary accuracy of death certificates for coding prostate cancer as a cause of death: Is reliance on death certification good enough? A comparison with blinded review by an independent cause of death evaluation committee

Authors :
Turner, Emma L
Metcalfe, Chris
Donovan, Jenny L
Noble, Sian
Sterne, Jonathan A C
Lane, J Athene
I Walsh, Eleanor
Hill, Elizabeth M
Down, Liz
Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
Oliver, Steven E
Evans, Simon
Brindle, Peter
Williams, Naomi J
Hughes, Laura J
Davies, Charlotte F
Ng, Siaw Yein
Neal, David E
Hamdy, Freddie C
Albertsen, Peter
Reid, Colette M
Oxley, Jon
McFarlane, John
Robinson, Mary C
Adolfsson, Jan
Zietman, Anthony
Baum, Michael
Koupparis, Anthony
Martin, Richard M
Source :
British Journal of Cancer, Turner, E, Metcalfe, C, Donovan, J, Noble, S, Sterne, J, Lane, A, Walsh, E, Hill, L, Down, L, Ben-Shlomo, Y, Oliver, S, Evans, S, Brindle, P, Williams, N, Hughes, L J, Davies, C, Ng, S Y, Neal, D, Hamdy, F C, Albertsen, P C, Reid, C, Oxley, J, McFarlane, J, Robinson, M, Adolfsson, J, Zietman, A, Baum, M, Koupparis, A & Martin, R 2016, ' Contemporary accuracy of death certificates for coding prostate cancer as a cause of death : Is reliance on death certification good enough? A comparison with blinded review by an independent cause of death evaluation committee. ', British Journal of Cancer, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 90–94 . https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.162
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Springer Nature, 2017.

Abstract

Background: Accurate cause of death assignment is crucial for prostate cancer epidemiology and trials reporting prostate cancer-specific mortality outcomes. Methods: We compared death certificate information with independent cause of death evaluation by an expert committee within a prostate cancer trial (2002-2015). Results: Of 1,236 deaths assessed, expert committee evaluation attributed 523 (42%) to prostate cancer, agreeing with death certificate cause of death in 1,134 cases (92%, 95% CI: 90%, 93%). The sensitivity of death certificates in identifying prostate cancer deaths as classified by the committee was 91% (95% CI: 89%, 94%); specificity was 92% (95% CI: 90%, 94%). Sensitivity and specificity were lower where death occurred within one year of diagnosis, and where there was another primary cancer diagnosis.Conclusion: UK death certificates accurately identify cause of death in men with prostate cancer, supporting their use in routine statistics. Possible differential misattribution by trial arm supports independent evaluation in randomised trials.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00070920
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
British Journal of Cancer, Turner, E, Metcalfe, C, Donovan, J, Noble, S, Sterne, J, Lane, A, Walsh, E, Hill, L, Down, L, Ben-Shlomo, Y, Oliver, S, Evans, S, Brindle, P, Williams, N, Hughes, L J, Davies, C, Ng, S Y, Neal, D, Hamdy, F C, Albertsen, P C, Reid, C, Oxley, J, McFarlane, J, Robinson, M, Adolfsson, J, Zietman, A, Baum, M, Koupparis, A & Martin, R 2016, ' Contemporary accuracy of death certificates for coding prostate cancer as a cause of death : Is reliance on death certification good enough? A comparison with blinded review by an independent cause of death evaluation committee. ', British Journal of Cancer, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 90–94 . https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.162
Accession number :
edsair.pmid.dedup....8a970c5f86790d804138778e798e6c34