Back to Search
Start Over
Intralesional agents in dermatology: Pros and cons
- Source :
- Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, Vol 14, Iss 3, Pp 285-294 (2021), Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Since introduced in 1961, intralesional (IL) agent has become an essential part of the dermatological practice. The term IL referred to the direct delivery of agent percutaneously into skin lesions. This therapeutic approach is relatively safe, easy to perform and applicable for a broad range of dermatological conditions. On the other hand, immediate side effects, including pain during administration, bleeding, high risk of infection and allergic reaction, and subsequent side effects involving skin changes such as atrophy, telangiectasia, pigmentary changes, and striae are usually associated with this modality. This review paper highlights the pros and cons of IL agents in modern dermatology practice.
- Subjects :
- Because intralesional agents are relatively safe, easy to implement, and effective in a broad spectrum of dermatological indication with excellent success rate and minimum systemic side effects, the trends in its use have been emerging nowadays. Pros over the cons make it a preferred choice in the dermatology field
bleomycin
mesotherapy
RD1-811
botulinum toxin-a and hyaluronic acid fillers
platelet-rich plasma
5-fluorouracil
Surgery
Review Article
immunotherapy
cryotherapy
corticosteroids
intralesional agents
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09742077
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
- Accession number :
- edsair.pmid.dedup....62f809d7daaaccf4131df611c97bb867