Back to Search Start Over

Comparative Electromechanical and Hemodynamic Effects of Left Ventricular and Biventricular Pacing in Dyssynchronous Heart Failure Electrical Resynchronization Versus Left–Right Ventricular Interaction

Authors :
Joost, Lumens
Sylvain, Ploux
Marc, Strik
John, Gorcsan
Hubert, Cochet
Nicolas, Derval
Maria, Strom
Charu, Ramanathan
Philippe, Ritter
Michel, Haïssaguerre
Pierre, Jaïs
Theo, Arts
Tammo, Delhaas
Frits W, Prinzen
Pierre, Bordachar
Biomedische Technologie
Fysiologie
Kindergeneeskunde
RS: CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 62(25), 2395-2403. Elsevier Science
Publisher :
American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to enhance understanding of the working mechanism of cardiac resynchronization therapy by comparing animal experimental, clinical, and computational data on the hemodynamic and electromechanical consequences of left ventricular pacing (LVP) and biventricular pacing (BiVP). Background It is unclear why LVP and BiVP have comparative positive effects on hemodynamic function of patients with dyssynchronous heart failure. Methods Hemodynamic response to LVP and BiVP (% change in maximal rate of left ventricular pressure rise [LVdP/dt(max)]) was measured in 6 dogs and 24 patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block followed by computer simulations of local myofiber mechanics during LVP and BiVP in the failing heart with left bundle branch block. Pacing-induced changes of electrical activation were measured in dogs using contact mapping and in patients using a noninvasive multielectrode electrocardiographic mapping technique. Results LVP and BiVP similarly increased LVdP/dt(max) in dogs and in patients, but only BiVP significantly decreased electrical dyssynchrony. In the simulations, LVP and BiVP increased total ventricular myofiber work to the same extent. While the LVP-induced increase was entirely due to enhanced right ventricular (RV) myofiber work, the BiVP-induced increase was due to enhanced myofiber work of both the left ventricle (LV) and RV. Overall, LVdP/dt(max) correlated better with total ventricular myofiber work than with LV or RV myofiber work alone. Conclusions Animal experimental, clinical, and computational data support the similarity of hemodynamic response to LVP and BiVP, despite differences in electrical dyssynchrony. The simulations provide the novel insight that, through ventricular interaction, the RV myocardium importantly contributes to the improvement in LV pump function induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07351097
Issue :
25
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.pmid.dedup....4b66dc22c9f6d1db07efa5379ccdb061
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.715