Back to Search Start Over

Prospective associations and population impact of sweet beverage intake and type 2 diabetes, and effects of substitutions with alternative beverages

Authors :
O’Connor, Laura
Imamura, Fumiaki
Lentjes, Marleen A. H.
Khaw, Kay-Tee
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Forouhi, Nita G.
Imamura, Fumiaki [0000-0002-6841-8396]
Lentjes, Marleen [0000-0003-4713-907X]
Khaw, Kay-Tee [0000-0002-8802-2903]
Wareham, Nicholas [0000-0003-1422-2993]
Forouhi, Nita [0000-0002-5041-248X]
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Source :
Diabetologia
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis This study aimed to evaluate the association of types of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) (soft drinks, sweetened-milk beverages, sweetened tea/coffee), artificially sweetened beverages (ASB) and fruit juice with incident type 2 diabetes and determine the effects of substituting non-SSB for SSB and the population-attributable fraction of type 2 diabetes due to total sweet beverages. Methods Beverage consumption of 25,639 UK-resident adults without diabetes at baseline (1993–1997) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Norfolk study was assessed using 7-day food diaries. During 10.8 years of follow-up 847 incident type 2 diabetes cases were verified. Results In adjusted Cox regression analyses there were positive associations (HR [95% CI] per serving/day]) for soft drinks 1.21 (1.05, 1.39), sweetened-milk beverages 1.22 (1.05, 1.43) and ASB 1.22 (1.11, 1.33), but not for sweetened tea/coffee 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) or fruit juice 1.01 (0.88, 1.15). Further adjustment for adiposity attenuated the association of ASB, HR 1.06 (0.93, 1.20). There was a positive dose–response relationship with total sweet beverages: HR per 5% energy 1.18 (1.11, 1.26). Substituting ASB for any SSB did not reduce the incidence in analyses accounting for energy intake and adiposity. Substituting one serving/day of water or unsweetened tea/coffee for soft drinks and for sweetened-milk beverages reduced the incidence by 14%–25%. If sweet beverage consumers reduced intake to below 2% energy, 15% of incident diabetes might be prevented. Conclusions/interpretation The consumption of soft drinks, sweetened-milk beverages and energy from total sweet beverages was associated with higher type 2 diabetes risk independently of adiposity. Water or unsweetened tea/coffee appear to be suitable alternatives to SSB for diabetes prevention. These findings support the implementation of population-based interventions to reduce SSB consumption and increase the consumption of suitable alternatives. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00125-015-3572-1) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.

Details

ISSN :
14320428
Volume :
58
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Diabetologia
Accession number :
edsair.pmid.dedup....22e046ac331be0e52a9e6f086ed92fe8