Back to Search Start Over

Central Pathology Review in SENTIX, a Prospective Observational International Study on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer (ENGOT-CX2)

Authors :
Kristyna Nemejcova
Roman Kocian
Christhardt Kohler
Jiri Jarkovsky
Jaroslav Klat
Alberto Berjon
Radovan Pilka
Borek Sehnal
Blanca Gil-Ibanez
Ezequiel Lupo
Almerinda Petiz
Octavio Arencibia Sanchez
Peter Kascak
Fabio Martinelli
Alessandro Buda
Jiri Presl
Marc Barahona
Luc van Lonkhuijzen
Wiktor Szatkowski
Lubos Minar
Maja Pakiz
Pavel Havelka
Cristina Zorrero
Marcin Misiek
Leon Cornelius Snyman
Dariusz Wydra
Ignace Vergote
Alla Vinnytska
Mikulas Redecha
Martin Michal
Solveig Tingulstad
Barbara Kipp
Grzegorz Szewczyk
Robert Toth
Francisco Javier de Santiago Garcia
Pluvio Jesus Coronado Martin
Robert Poka
Karl Tamussino
Mathieu Luyckx
Maxime Fastrez
Juan Carlos Staringer
Anna Germanova
Andrea Plaikner
Sylva Bajsova
Pavel Dundr
Nina Mallmann-Gottschalk
David Cibula
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
UCL - (SLuc) Service de gynécologie et d'andrologie
UCL - SSS/IREC/GYNE - Pôle de Gynécologie
Source :
Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona, Cancers, 12(5):1115. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Cancers, Vol. 12, no. 5, p. 1115 [1-13] (2020), Cancers, Volume 12, Issue 5, Cancers, Vol 12, Iss 1115, p 1115 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
MDPI, 2020.

Abstract

The quality of pathological assessment is crucial for the safety of patients with cervical cancer if pelvic lymph node dissection is to be replaced by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Central pathology review of SLN pathological ultrastaging was conducted in the prospective SENTIX/European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial (ENGOT)-CX2 study. All specimens from at least two patients per site were submitted for the central review. For cases with major or critical deviations, the sites were requested to submit all samples from all additional patients for second-round assessment. From the group of 300 patients, samples from 83 cases from 37 sites were reviewed in the first round. Minor, major, critical, and no deviations were identified in 28%, 19%, 14%, and 39% of cases, respectively. Samples from 26 patients were submitted for the second-round review, with only two major deviations found. In conclusion, a high rate of major or critical deviations was identified in the first round of the central pathology review (28% of samples). This reflects a substantial heterogeneity in current practice, despite trial protocol requirements. The importance of the central review conducted prospectively at the early phase of the trial is demonstrated by a substantial improvement of SLN ultrastaging quality in the second-round review. ispartof: CANCERS vol:12 issue:5 ispartof: location:Switzerland status: published

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20726694
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona, Cancers, 12(5):1115. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Cancers, Vol. 12, no. 5, p. 1115 [1-13] (2020), Cancers, Volume 12, Issue 5, Cancers, Vol 12, Iss 1115, p 1115 (2020)
Accession number :
edsair.pmid.dedup....0f61c5981537a3d11c475dd4c02d1e56