Back to Search Start Over

A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Dose-Ranging Trial Of

Authors :
Jeremy M, Shefner
Jinsy A, Andrews
Angela, Genge
Carlayne, Jackson
Noah, Lechtzin
Timothy M, Miller
Bettina M, Cockroft
Lisa, Meng
Jenny, Wei
Andrew A, Wolff
Fady I, Malik
Cynthia, Bodkin
Benjamin R, Brooks
James, Caress
Annie, Dionne
Dominic, Fee
Stephen A, Goutman
Namita A, Goyal
Orla, Hardiman
Ghazala, Hayat
Terry, Heiman-Patterson
Daragh, Heitzman
Robert D, Henderson
Wendy, Johnston
Chafic, Karam
Matthew C, Kiernan
Stephen J, Kolb
Lawrence, Korngut
Shafeeq, Ladha
Genevieve, Matte
Jesus S, Mora
Merrilee, Needham
Bjorn, Oskarsson
Gary L, Pattee
Erik P, Pioro
Michael, Pulley
Dianna, Quan
Kourosh, Rezania
Kerri L, Schellenberg
David, Schultz
Christen, Shoesmith
Zachary, Simmons
Jeffrey, Statland
Shumaila, Sultan
Andrea, Swenson
Leonard H Van Den, Berg
Tuan, Vu
Steve, Vucic
Michael, Weiss
Ashley, Whyte-Rayson
James, Wymer
Lorne, Zinman
Stacy A, Rudnicki
Source :
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate safety, dose response, and preliminary efficacy of reldesemtiv over 12 weeks in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods: Patients (≤2 years since diagnosis) with slow upright vital capacity (SVC) of ≥60% were randomized 1:1:1:1 to reldesemtiv 150, 300, or 450 mg twice daily (bid) or placebo; active treatment was 12 weeks with 4-week follow-up. Primary endpoint was change in percent predicted SVC at 12 weeks; secondary measures included ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and muscle strength mega-score. Results: Patients (N = 458) were enrolled; 85% completed 12-week treatment. The primary analysis failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.11); secondary endpoints showed no statistically significant effects (ALSFRS-R, p = 0.09; muscle strength megascore, p = 0.31). Post hoc analyses pooling all active reldesemtiv-treated patients compared against placebo showed trends toward benefit in all endpoints (progression rate for SVC, ALSFRS-R, and muscle strength mega-score (nominal p values of 0.10, 0.01 and 0.20 respectively)). Reldesemtiv was well tolerated, with nausea and fatigue being the most common side effects. A dose-dependent decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was noted, and transaminase elevations were seen in approximately 5% of patients. Both hepatic and renal abnormalities trended toward resolution after study drug discontinuation. Conclusions: Although the primary efficacy analysis did not demonstrate statistical significance, there were trends favoring reldesemtiv for all three endpoints, with effect sizes generally regarded as clinically important. Tolerability was good; modest hepatic and renal abnormalities were reversible. The impact of reldesemtiv on patients with ALS should be assessed in a pivotal Phase 3 trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03160898)

Details

ISSN :
21679223
Volume :
22
Issue :
3-4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosisfrontotemporal degeneration
Accession number :
edsair.pmid..........ecaeaa5a40cd6b69dedae5d239784f79