Back to Search Start Over

The Influence of Number and Timing of Pregnancies on Breast Cancer Risk for Women With

Authors :
Mary Beth, Terry
Yuyan, Liao
Karin, Kast
Antonis C, Antoniou
Jasmine A, McDonald
Thea M, Mooij
Christoph, Engel
Catherine, Nogues
Bruno, Buecher
Véronique, Mari
Jessica, Moretta-Serra
Laurence, Gladieff
Elisabeth, Luporsi
Daniel, Barrowdale
Debra, Frost
Alex, Henderson
Carole, Brewer
D Gareth, Evans
Diana, Eccles
Jackie, Cook
Kai-Ren, Ong
Louise, Izatt
Munaza, Ahmed
Patrick J, Morrison
Charlotte J, Dommering
Jan C, Oosterwijk
Margreet G E M, Ausems
Mieke, Kriege
Saundra S, Buys
Irene L, Andrulis
Esther M, John
Mary, Daly
Michael, Friedlander
Sue Anne, McLachlan
Ana, Osorio
Trinidad, Caldes
Anna, Jakubowska
Jacques, Simard
Christian F, Singer
Yen, Tan
Edith, Olah
Marie, Navratilova
Lenka, Foretova
Anne-Marie, Gerdes
Marie-José, Roos-Blom
Brita, Arver
Håkan, Olsson
Rita K, Schmutzler
John L, Hopper
Flora E, van Leeuwen
David, Goldgar
Roger L, Milne
Douglas F, Easton
Matti A, Rookus
Nadine, Andrieu
Source :
Jnci Cancer Spectrum
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background Full-term pregnancy (FTP) is associated with a reduced breast cancer (BC) risk over time, but women are at increased BC risk in the immediate years following an FTP. No large prospective studies, however, have examined whether the number and timing of pregnancies are associated with BC risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Methods Using weighted and time-varying Cox proportional hazards models, we investigated whether reproductive events are associated with BC risk for mutation carriers using a retrospective cohort (5707 BRCA1 and 3525 BRCA2 mutation carriers) and a prospective cohort (2276 BRCA1 and 1610 BRCA2 mutation carriers), separately for each cohort and the combined prospective and retrospective cohort. Results For BRCA1 mutation carriers, there was no overall association with parity compared with nulliparity (combined hazard ratio [HRc] = 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83 to 1.18). Relative to being uniparous, an increased number of FTPs was associated with decreased BC risk (HRc = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.91; HRc = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.59 to 0.82; HRc = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.63, for 2, 3, and ≥4 FTPs, respectively, Ptrend < .0001) and increasing duration of breastfeeding was associated with decreased BC risk (combined cohort Ptrend = .0003). Relative to being nulliparous, uniparous BRCA1 mutation carriers were at increased BC risk in the prospective analysis (prospective hazard ration [HRp] = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.09 to 2.62). For BRCA2 mutation carriers, being parous was associated with a 30% increase in BC risk (HRc = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.69), and there was no apparent decrease in risk associated with multiparity except for having at least 4 FTPs vs. 1 FTP (HRc = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.98). Conclusions These findings suggest differential associations with parity between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with higher risk for uniparous BRCA1 carriers and parous BRCA2 carriers.

Details

ISSN :
25155091
Volume :
2
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JNCI cancer spectrum
Accession number :
edsair.pmid..........d4de88fd2ce0409eb2ae2e9c54361bdc