Back to Search Start Over

Naming and outline of

Authors :
Nalin N, Wijayawardene
Pedro W, Crous
Paul M, Kirk
David L, Hawksworth
Saranyaphat, Boonmee
Uwe, Braun
Dong-Qin, Dai
Melvina J, D'souza
Paul, Diederich
Asha, Dissanayake
Mingkhuan, Doilom
Singang, Hongsanan
E B Gareth, Jones
Johannes Z, Groenewald
Ruvishika, Jayawardena
James D, Lawrey
Jian-Kui, Liu
Robert, Lücking
Hugo, Madrid
Dimuthu S, Manamgoda
Lucia, Muggia
Matthew P, Nelsen
Rungtiwa, Phookamsak
Satinee, Suetrong
Kazuaki, Tanaka
Kasun M, Thambugala
Dhanushka N, Wanasinghe
Saowanee, Wikee
Ying, Zhang
André, Aptroot
H A, Ariyawansa
Ali H, Bahkali
D Jayarama, Bhat
Cécile, Gueidan
Putarak, Chomnunti
G Sybren, De Hoog
Kerry, Knudsen
Wen-Jing, Li
Eric H C, McKenzie
Andrew N, Miller
Alan J L, Phillips
Marcin, Piątek
Huzefa A, Raja
Roger S, Shivas
Bernad, Slippers
Joanne E, Taylor
Qing, Tian
Yong, Wang
Joyce H C, Woudenberg
Lei, Cai
Walter M, Jaklitsch
Kevin D, Hyde
Source :
Fungal diversity. 69(1)
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Article 59.1, of the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (ICN; Melbourne Code), which addresses the nomenclature of pleomorphic fungi, became effective from 30 July 2011. Since that date, each fungal species can have one nomenclaturally correct name in a particular classification. All other previously used names for this species will be considered as synonyms. The older generic epithet takes priority over the younger name. Any widely used younger names proposed for use, must comply with Art. 57.2 and their usage should be approved by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi (NCF). In this paper, we list all genera currently accepted by us in Dothideomycetes (belonging to 23 orders and 110 families), including pleomorphic and nonpleomorphic genera. In the case of pleomorphic genera, we follow the rulings of the current ICN and propose single generic names for future usage. The taxonomic placements of 1261 genera are listed as an outline. Protected names and suppressed names for 34 pleomorphic genera are listed separately. Notes and justifications are provided for possible proposed names after the list of genera. Notes are also provided on recent advances in our understanding of asexual and sexual morph linkages in Dothideomycetes. A phylogenetic tree based on four gene analyses supported 23 orders and 75 families, while 35 families still lack molecular data.

Subjects

Subjects :
Article

Details

ISSN :
15602745
Volume :
69
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Fungal diversity
Accession number :
edsair.pmid..........8d7dc9fdfc564528c783d4d9c1121376