Cite
[Resection anastomosis of the small intestine by celioscopy in swine. Comparative experimental study between manual and mechanical anastomosis]
MLA
P, Noël, et al. “[Resection Anastomosis of the Small Intestine by Celioscopy in Swine. Comparative Experimental Study between Manual and Mechanical Anastomosis].” Annales de Chirurgie, vol. 48, no. 10, Jan. 1994. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.pmid..........62f15e97229fce475c8c46b4aac260af&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
P, N., H, F., J M, F., C, M., F, Q., F, G., H, B., & J, D. (1994). [Resection anastomosis of the small intestine by celioscopy in swine. Comparative experimental study between manual and mechanical anastomosis]. Annales de Chirurgie, 48(10).
Chicago
P, Noël, Fagot H, Fabre J M, Mann C, Quenet F, Guillon F, Baumel H, and Domergue J. 1994. “[Resection Anastomosis of the Small Intestine by Celioscopy in Swine. Comparative Experimental Study between Manual and Mechanical Anastomosis].” Annales de Chirurgie 48 (10). http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.pmid..........62f15e97229fce475c8c46b4aac260af&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.