Prospective correlative chemosensitivity testing in high-dose intraarterial chemotherapy for liver metastases

Clinical response of liver metastases treated by high-dose intraarterial chemotherapy (HDIAC) delivered via the hepatic artery was predicted by a modification of the human tumor colony-forming assay (HTCFA) originally described by Hamburger and Salmon [Science (Wash. DC), 197:461-463, 1977. In a first set of experiments, the immediate clinical response to HDIAC was determined in 12 patients with colorectal liver metastases. Biopsies were taken immediately before and after HDIAC, and cells were plated in the HTCFA. Three patients received intraoperative 4-epidoxorubicin and another 9 received mitomycin C by 15-min intraarterial infusions. Sensitivity in the HTCFA was defined as 50% inhibition of colony formation in tumors exposed to the chemotherapeutic agent, compared to the untreated controls. Clinical response was accurately predicted by the HTCFA in 11 of 12 cases. Eight patients had a regression of disease following HDIAC treatment with mitomycin C, as evidenced by either greater than 50% reduction in carcinoembryonic antigen serum level (7 patients) or regression of tumor by computed tomography scan (1 patient). Three patients had no evidence of clinical response to epidoxorubicin, and their tumors were resistant to epidoxorubicin in the HTCFA. One tumor was sensitive to mitomycin C in the HTCFA, but serum carcinoembryonic antigen in the patient continued to increase following HDIAC. The HTCFA was also performed on untreated biopsies following incubation in vitro with the drug used for HDIAC. Results correlated with clinical response in all 12 cases. In a second set of experiments, the HTCFA was used to predict the long-term clinical response to HDIAC of 30 patients with liver metastases. One patient had breast cancer metastases, one patient had carcinoid liver metastases, 4 had liver metastases of malignant melanoma, and 24 patients had colorectal liver metastases. All 21 of the patients whose tumors were sensitive in vitro had clinical response, while 6 of 9 patients predicted by the HTCFA to be resistant had no clinical response. Our results demonstrate a high correlation between the HTCFA and clinical response.