Development and validation of a new outcome score in subglottic stenosis

We prospectively evaluated a clinical and endoscopic score, the tracheal endoscopic clinical score (TECS), developed as a disease-specified outcome measure in adult patients undergoing operation for subglottic stenosis. We also performed a retrospective chart review to identify preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for worse TECS.The TECS includes endoscopic (vocal cord and glottic function, anastomotic healing, and patency) and interview (respiration, voice, swallow) variables, and was administered at 6-month follow-up. Endoscopic and subjective domains were weighted to obtain a continuous TECS index ranging from 0 (best) to 1 (worse). The TECS and preoperative variables relationships were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.We collected data (January 2009 to December 2010) from 30 patients (mean age, 48.3±19 years) undergoing subglottic resection and primary reconstruction. Stenosis etiology was postintubation (n=8), idiopathic (n=2), tracheostomy (n=18), and malignant (n=2). Surgery included Pearson operation with (n=7) or without (n=23) a Liberman-Mathisen cricoplasty. Mean length of resected trachea was 30.5±13.5 mm, and mean hospital stay was 7.4 days. Mortality rate was 1 patient (3.3%). The univariate analysis showed positive correlation between 6-month TECS and degree of stenosis (McCaffrey and Cotton scale 0 to 4) stage 4, tracheostomy or T-tube at surgery, bottleneck-type transition stenosis, and resection length. At multivariate analysis, the presence of tracheostomy, bottleneck-type transition stenosis and resection length were indicators of worse postoperative functional result.The TECS seems to be a valid and simple instrument to identify preoperative variables predicting worse results and to assess postoperative outcome. Validation on larger series is necessary.