[Do combinations without cisplatin represent an alternative to conventional chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancers?]

Chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancers is based on cisplatin, which prolongs survival. However, the high toxicity of double-type combinations including cisplatin warrants the search for alternatives. New anti-cancer cytotoxic agents exhibit improved efficacy-toxicity ratio. Bitherapy, without cisplatin and with new molecules, provides hope of improvement in survival without deterioration in quality of life. Several randomised trials, already published or presented with mature results, suggest that certain bitherapies with new cytostatic agents are an alternative to the classical cisplatin-based bitherapies. The recent modifications in the guidelines of the American Association of Clinical Oncology take into account these recent results by admitting that "chemotherapy without cisplatin can be used as an alternative to the first-line platin-based chemotherapies". This brief review of the literature underlines the methodological questions raised by the publication of randomised studies essentially assessing gemcitabine-vinorelbine or gemcitabine-taxane combinations, by confronting them with either mono-chemotherapies or reference chemotherapy based on cisplatin. The assessment criteria selected in such studies are discussed.