Abnormalities in organ blood flow and its distribution during positive end-expiratory pressure

Current evidence is inconclusive regarding the possibility that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) redistributes flow and may be directly responsible for systemic organ dysfunction. This study tests the hypothesis that PEEP may induce abnormalities in the distribution of cardiac output (CO). Eight anesthetized dogs were studied during (1) 0 cm H2O PEEP (Z1), (2) 15 cm H2O PEEP (P), (3) Z2, and (4) bleeding (B) to reduce the CO to the same level as P. At each of the four periods, a different 15 mu radiolabelled microsphere was injected into the left atrium. Another four dogs were used to varify that each type of microsphere had the same flow distribution. CO fell from 3.1 liters/min to 1.9 during P (P smaller than 0.01) and to 2.0 during B (P smaller than 0.01). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) declined from 102 to 83 mm Hg (P smaller than 0.01) and 86 mm Hg (P smaller than 0.01(, respectively. Left atrial pressure (LAP) rose from 5.0 to 7.9 mm Hg during P (P smaller than 0.01) and fell during B to 2.7 mm Hg. c0 and its distribution were the same during Z1 and Z2. P caused selective reductions in hepatic (52%), adrenal (25%), and bronchial (24%) blood flows (P smaller than 0.01). In contrast, total flow to these organs during B was the same as during Z. Total renal flow was unchanged by P or B, but the cortical:medullary flow ratio increased during P from 24 to 49 (P smaller than 0.01) and was unchanged by B. P induced a decrease in fundal nucosal flow as compared with Z (P smaller than 0.01). Total coronary flow fell from 100 to 64 ml/min during both P and B (P smaller than 0.01). P led to a selective fall in subendocardial flow (67 ml/min X 100 gm) as compared with B (82.5 ML/MIN X 100 gm, P smaller than 0.01) as well as in the subendocardial:subepicardial flow ratio (1.069 vs. 1.112 ml/min X 100 gm, P smaller than 0.05). It is likely that the higher left ventricular filling pressure (LAP) during P as compared with during B compressed the endocardium and induced relative ischemia. Similarly the high airway pressure during P may have impeded bronchial mucosal flow. The causes and consequences of the other P-induced variations in flow are speculative.