[The use of early enteral nutrition (EEN) after major urologic surgery]

To evaluate the efficacy of early enteral nutrition in management of patients operated by major urologic surgery and to demonstrate her advantages versus total parenteral nutrition.20 patients, operated by radical cystectomy and urinary diversion by ureteroileocutaneostomy, Padua ileal bladder or ureterosigmoidostomy are inserted in our study: 12 were treated by early enteral nutrition for 8 days and eight by total parenteral nutrition for the same period: in each group nutritional and immunological parameters at day -1, +3 and +7, the length of postoperatory stay, the incidence of complications, with particular respect for infections have been evaluated and correlated one to each other.We have no death in each group; in the first group no gastroenteric allergy to the nutrient, less incidence of venous catheter and surgical wound infections (respectively p0.01 and p0.005); we have no significant decrease of postoperatory stay length; the effective problem in this group was the incidence of diarrhea, that in one case have made necessary the suspension of enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition costs were about half of those of total parenteral nutrition.We believe that early enteral nutrition is an effective and safe nutrition method in patients operated by major urologic surgery: with this is possible a better nutrition, that reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, mainly infections, and maybe the length of postoperatory stay (our champion is too small for statistical evaluation), that may lead to a decrease in management costs of these patients.