Back to Search Start Over

Translating evidence-based falls prevention into clinical practice in nursing facilities: Results and lessons from a quality improvement collaborative

Authors :
Cathleen, Colón-Emeric
Anna, Schenck
Joel, Gorospe
Jill, McArdle
Lee, Dobson
Cindy, Deporter
Eleanor, McConnell
Source :
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 54(9)
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

To describe the changes in process of care before and after an evidence-based fall reduction quality improvement collaborative in nursing facilities.Natural experiment with nonparticipating facilities serving as controls.Community nursing homes.Thirty-six participating and 353 nonparticipating nursing facilities in North Carolina.Two in-person learning sessions, monthly teleconferences, and an e-mail discussion list over 9 months. The change package emphasized screening, labeling, and risk-factor reduction.Compliance was measured using facility self-report and chart abstraction (n = 832) before and after the intervention. Fall rates as measured using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) were compared with those of nonparticipating facilities as an exploratory outcome.Self-reported compliance with screening, labeling, and risk-factor reduction approached 100%. Chart abstraction revealed only modest improvements in screening (51% to 68%, P.05), risk-factor reduction (4% to 7%, P = .30), and medication assessment (2% to 6%, P = .34). There was a significant increase in vitamin D prescriptions (40% to 48%, P=.03) and decrease in sedative-hypnotics (19% to 12%, P = .04) but no change in benzodiazepine, neuroleptic, or calcium use. No significant changes in proportions of fallers or fall rates were observed according to chart abstraction (28.6% to 37.5%, P = .17), MDS (18.2% to 15.4%, P = .56), or self-report (6.1-5.6 falls/1,000 bed days, P = .31).Multiple-risk-factor reduction tasks are infrequently implemented, whereas screening tasks appear more easily modifiable in a real-world setting. Substantial differences between self-reported practice and medical record documentation require that additional data sources be used to assess the change-in-care processes resulting from quality improvement programs. Interventions to improve interdisciplinary collaboration need to be developed.

Details

ISSN :
00028614
Volume :
54
Issue :
9
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Accession number :
edsair.pmid..........00d2a60172e8fd79e13acac5f8f55f49