Back to Search Start Over

Predictive value for cardiovascular events of common carotid intima media thickness and its rate of change in individuals at high cardiovascular risk – Results from the PROG-IMT collaboration

Authors :
Lorenz, Matthias W.
Gao, Lu
Ziegelbauer, Kathrin
Norata, Giuseppe Danilo
Empana, Jean Philippe
Schmidtmann, Irene
Lin, Hung Ju
McLachlan, Stela
Bokemark, Lena
Ronkainen, Kimmo
Amato, Mauro
Schminke, Ulf
Srinivasan, Sathanur R.
Lind, Lars
Okazaki, Shuhei
Stehouwer, Coen D.A.
Willeit, Peter
Polak, Joseph F.
Steinmetz, Helmuth
Sander, Dirk
Poppert, Holger
Desvarieux, Moise
Arfan Ikram, M.
Johnsen, Stein Harald
Staub, Daniel
Sirtori, Cesare R.
Iglseder, Bernhard
Beloqui, Oscar
Engström, Gunnar
Friera, Alfonso
Rozza, Francesco
Xie, Wuxiang
Parraga, Grace
Grigore, Liliana
Plichart, Matthieu
Blankenberg, Stefan
Su, Ta Chen
Schmidt, Caroline
Tuomainen, Tomi Pekka
Veglia, Fabrizio
Völzke, Henry
Nijpels, Giel
Willeit, Johann
Sacco, Ralph L.
Franco, Oscar H.
Uthoff, Heiko
Hedblad, Bo
Suarez, Carmen
Izzo, Raffaele
Bots, Michiel L.
on behalf of the PROG-IMT study group
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Aims Carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) predicts cardiovascular (CVD) events, but the predictive value of CIMT change is debated. We assessed the relation between CIMT change and events in individuals at high cardiovascular risk. Methods and results From 31 cohorts with two CIMT scans (total n = 89070) on average 3.6 years apart and clinical follow-up, subcohorts were drawn: (A) individuals with at least 3 cardiovascular risk factors without previous CVD events, (B) individuals with carotid plaques without previous CVD events, and (C) individuals with previous CVD events. Cox regression models were fit to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of the combined endpoint (myocardial infarction, stroke or vascular death) per standard deviation (SD) of CIMT change, adjusted for CVD risk factors. These HRs were pooled across studies. In groups A, B and C we observed 3483, 2845 and 1165 endpoint events, respectively. Average common CIMT was 0.79mm (SD 0.16mm), and annual common CIMT change was 0.01mm (SD 0.07mm), both in group A. The pooled HR per SD of annual common CIMT change (0.02 to 0.43mm) was 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.95–1.02) in group A, 0.98 (0.93–1.04) in group B, and 0.95 (0.89–1.04) in group C. The HR per SD of common CIMT (average of the first and the second CIMT scan, 0.09 to 0.75mm) was 1.15 (1.07–1.23) in group A, 1.13 (1.05–1.22) in group B, and 1.12 (1.05–1.20) in group C. Conclusions We confirm that common CIMT is associated with future CVD events in individuals at high risk. CIMT change does not relate to future event risk in high-risk individuals.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.od.....10691..2f87a5183f152bf1ddc06d1ca71cc0a9