Cite
Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus conventional two dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of therapeutic response of hepatocellular carcinoma after local therapies
MLA
Bartolotta, Tommaso Vincenzo, et al. Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound versus Conventional Two Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Therapeutic Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Local Therapies. Jan. 2011. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.od......3658..5434807e872859d715c7490497422a52&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
Bartolotta, T. V., Taibbi, A., Brancatelli, G., Tortorici, L., Galia, M., Midiri, M., & Lo Re, G. (2011). Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus conventional two dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of therapeutic response of hepatocellular carcinoma after local therapies.
Chicago
Bartolotta, Tommaso Vincenzo, Adele Taibbi, Giuseppe Brancatelli, Luigi Tortorici, Massimo Galia, Massimo Midiri, and G Lo Re. 2011. “Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound versus Conventional Two Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Therapeutic Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Local Therapies,” January. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.od......3658..5434807e872859d715c7490497422a52&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.