Back to Search
Start Over
Defamation on Facebook: Isparta v Richter 2013 6 SA 529 (GP)
- Source :
- PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, Volume: 17, Issue: 6, Pages: 2845-2868, Published: 2014
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus), 2014.
-
Abstract
- Litigation involving social media is still very new in South Africa and only a few reported cases can be found. In this case discussion, a brief overview is given of the few cases already reported, but in the main the case of Isparta v Richter 2013 6 SA 4529 (GP) is discussed. In this case a South African court for the first time awarded damages to the plaintiff for defamatory comments made on Facebook. The questions that confronted the judge were whether the alleged defamatory statements did indeed relate to the plaintiff and whether the comments, individually or collectively, could be considered defamatory. The issue whether the "tagging" of another user of Facebook makes that user liable for the defamatory comments of the tagger is also addressed in the case. The case discussion concludes with a reference to other issues that could play a role in litigation involving Facebook, namely the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 and foreign law.
- Subjects :
- defamation
interdict
Facebook
social media
privilege
Mxit
reputation
fair comment
internet service provider liability
boni mores
electronic media
intent
wrongfulness
grounds of justification
apology
freedom of speech
takedown-notification
jurisdiction
Applicable law
freedom of expression
internet
ECT Act
harmful content
reasonable publication
social networking service
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, Volume: 17, Issue: 6, Pages: 2845-2868, Published: 2014
- Accession number :
- edsair.od......1575..fcdb78ecbfd0f60795b59b2e3f37dab7