Are we ready for haptic interactivity in VR? An experimental comparison of different interaction methods in virtual reality training

In recent years, Virtual Reality (VR) has gained attention as a tool for a plethora of applications such as first-aid, firefighting and in the automotive industry. End-user immersion is a key factor in these applications to make the experience representative for its real-life counterpart. By enhancing the traditional audiovisual cues with additional sensory inputs in terms of haptic vibro-tactile and kinesthetic feedback, this immersion can be improved. But are current haptic implementations sufficient to provide the required added value? And how do they compare to other types of VR interaction? In this paper, we present a multi-modal VR training framework able to provide subjective and objective comparisons among three different interaction options: (i) haptic gloves, (ii) traditional VR controllers, and (iii) non-haptic handtracking. We performed a user test where the different interactivity flavours were compared in terms of their influence on both subjective perception and objective performance of the end-user by means of three VR training scenarios. The subjective results show an aversion towards non-haptic handtracking for constrained, cognitively light tasks while a preference towards controllers exist for more cognitively heavy multi-tasking. This is however not reflected in objective results, where differences between interaction methods are far less pronounced.