Cite
High speed fundus photography or optical coherence tomography angiography - which one is better for non-invasive capillary perfusion maps and velocity measurements?
MLA
Jayadev, C., et al. High Speed Fundus Photography or Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography - Which One Is Better for Non-Invasive Capillary Perfusion Maps and Velocity Measurements? Sept. 2016. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.narcis........5801cf308c7024954ba37fd459dc5aff&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
Jayadev, C., Mohan, A., Grinvald, A., Bauer, N., Berendschot, T. T. J. M., & Webers, C. (2016). High speed fundus photography or optical coherence tomography angiography - which one is better for non-invasive capillary perfusion maps and velocity measurements?
Chicago
Jayadev, C., A. Mohan, A. Grinvald, N. Bauer, T.T.J.M. Berendschot, and C. Webers. 2016. “High Speed Fundus Photography or Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography - Which One Is Better for Non-Invasive Capillary Perfusion Maps and Velocity Measurements?,” September. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.narcis........5801cf308c7024954ba37fd459dc5aff&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.