Back to Search Start Over

Lung cancer and socioeconomic status in a pooled analysis of case-control studies

Authors :
Hovanec, Jan
Siemiatycki, Jack
Conway, David I
Olsson, Ann
Stücker, Isabelle
Guida, Florence
Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
Pohlabeln, Hermann
Ahrens, Wolfgang
Brüske, Irene
Wichmann, Heinz-Erich
Gustavsson, Per
Consonni, Dario
Merletti, Franco
Richiardi, Lorenzo
Simonato, Lorenzo
Fortes, Cristina
Parent, Marie-Elise
McLaughlin, John
Demers, Paul
Landi, Maria Teresa
Caporaso, Neil E
Tardón, Adonina
Zaridze, David
Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Neonila
Rudnai, Peter
Lissowska, Jolanta
Fabianova, Eleonora
Field, John K
Dumitru, Rodica Stanescu
Bencko, Vladimir
Foretova, Lenka
Janout, Vladimir
Kromhout, Hans
Vermeulen, Roel
Boffetta, Paolo
Straif, Kurt
Schüz, Joachim
Kendzia, Benjamin
Pesch, Beate
Brüning, Thomas
Behrens, Thomas
One Health Chemisch
dIRAS RA-2
Source :
PLoS One, 13(2). Public Library of Science
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An association between low socioeconomic status (SES) and lung cancer has been observed in several studies, but often without adequate control for smoking behavior. We studied the association between lung cancer and occupationally derived SES, using data from the international pooled SYNERGY study. METHODS: Twelve case-control studies from Europe and Canada were included in the analysis. Based on occupational histories of study participants we measured SES using the International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status (ISEI) and the European Socio-economic Classification (ESeC). We divided the ISEI range into categories, using various criteria. Stratifying by gender, we calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by unconditional logistic regression, adjusting for age, study, and smoking behavior. We conducted analyses by histological subtypes of lung cancer and subgroup analyses by study region, birth cohort, education and occupational exposure to known lung carcinogens. RESULTS: The analysis dataset included 17,021 cases and 20,885 controls. There was a strong elevated OR between lung cancer and low SES, which was attenuated substantially after adjustment for smoking, however a social gradient persisted. SES differences in lung cancer risk were higher among men (lowest vs. highest SES category: ISEI OR 1.84 (95% CI 1.61-2.09); ESeC OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.44-1.63)), than among women (lowest vs. highest SES category: ISEI OR 1.54 (95% CI 1.20-1.98); ESeC OR 1.34 (95% CI 1.19-1.52)). CONCLUSION: SES remained a risk factor for lung cancer after adjustment for smoking behavior.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLoS One, 13(2). Public Library of Science
Accession number :
edsair.narcis........1ecac9640374ce82bcca3ddb0b702acd