Back to Search Start Over

A clinical evaluation of AMS Hydroflex in the treatment of impotence

Authors :
Yoshida, Osamu
Okada, Yusaku
Arai, Yoichi
Shirai, Masafumi
Takanami, Masaharu
Marumo, Ken
Tazaki, Hiroshi
Koshiba, Ken
Fujino, Awato
Kihara, Yuji
Kanamaru, Hiroshi
Itatani, Hiroaki
Mannami, Makoto
Matsuhisa, Susumu
Hara, Sanshin
Yoshida, Takashi
Iwatsubo, Eiji
Source :
泌尿器科紀要. 37(8):935-941
Publication Year :
1991
Publisher :
泌尿器科紀要刊行会, 1991.

Abstract

器質性インポテンス患者34名に対しAMSハイドロフレックスをインプラントして12週後, 1)満足度:非常に満足, 性交可能16例, 性交可能で満足13例, 性交可能でやや不満2例, 改善なし1例, 不明2例, 2)有用度:極めて有用20例, 有用11例, やや有用1例, 好ましくない1例, 判定不能1例, 3)副作用:海綿体膿瘍で抜去の1例, 平均19.2ヵ月中感染糜爛で抜去2例となった<br />The AMS Hydroflex penile prosthesis was implanted in 34 organic impotence patients between June 20, 1986 and Aug. 6, 1990. Patients ages ranged between 26 and 71 with an average of 50.5. The causes of impotences were; 17 cases of post-radical pelvic surgery, 7 cases of injury, 6 cases of diabetes and 4 of others. First evaluation was made after 12 weeks of implantation in terms of patient satisfaction with sexual intercourse and post operative complication. Sixteen patients (47.1%) were highly satisfied with intercourse, 13 (38.2%) satisfied with intercourse, 2 (5.9%) slightly dissatisfied even with successful intercourse, 1 (2.9%) with no improvement and 2 (5.9%) could not follow. Utility of the prosthesis, e.g. effectiveness and safety was; high utility in 20 (58.8%), good utility in 11 (32.4%), slight utility in 1 (2.9%), no favorable in 1 (2.9%) and no judgement in 1 (2.9%). The overall effectiveness and safety of the Hydroflex was demonstrated based on the above findings. Long term evaluation was made from the initial implantation of the device up to the termination of the trial with average of 19.2 months and was mentioned altogether.

Details

Language :
Japanese
ISSN :
00181994
Volume :
37
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
泌尿器科紀要
Accession number :
edsair.jairo.........1a0f6252d858e9d150f62e85819e2a36