Pravna narava Države in Kraljestva/Kraljevine SHS v konfliktu jugoslovanskih ideologij

Acstract: The main thesis of the article is that the differences in the interpretations of the legal natures of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes were not the consequence of legal uncertainty, but rather reflected yet another among the many political battles in the conflict between the opposing Yugoslav ideologies. The author uses the international and constitutional criteria to analyse the dilemmas regarding the legal nature of the State of SHS and the legal (dis)continuity between the Kingdom of Serbia and the Kingdom of SHS. He argues that: 1) the State of SHS satisfied the fundamental requirements to be considered as a state; and 2) the Kingdom of SHS was a new state, as it was not created according to the standards of the Serbian Constitution. Moreover, it suspended the constitutional continuity of the Kingdom of Serbia.
Izvleček: Glavna teza prispevka je, da razlike v razlagi pravne narave tako Države kot tudi Kraljevine Srbov, Hrvatov in Slovencev niso bile posledica pravne negotovosti, temveč so bile le odraz še ene med številnimi političnimi bitkami v vojni nasprotujočih si jugoslovanskih ideologij. Avtor uporablja mednarodna in ustavna merila ter analizira dileme glede pravne narave države SHS in pravne (dis)kontinuitete med Kraljevino Srbijo in Kraljevino SHS. Avtor na temelju analize argumentira, da: 1) je država SHS izpolnjevala temeljne kriterije državnosti in jo lahko smatramo kot državo, ter da 2) je bila Kraljevina SHS nova država, saj ni bila ustvarjena v skladu s standardi prejšnje srbske ustave; ravno nasprotno, Kraljevina SHS je prekinila ustavno kontinuiteto Kraljevine Srbije.