Back to Search
Start Over
Gastric Electrical Stimulation Reduces Refractory Vomiting in a Randomized Crossover Trial
- Source :
- Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology, WB Saunders, 2020, 158 (3), pp.506-514.e2. ⟨10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.018⟩, Gastroenterology, Elsevier, 2020, 158 (3), pp.506-514.e2. ⟨10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.018⟩, Gastroenterology, 2020, 158 (3), pp.506-514.e2. ⟨10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.018⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2020.
-
Abstract
- There have been conflicting results from trials of gastric electrical stimulation (GES) for treatment of refractory vomiting, associated or not with gastroparesis. We performed a large, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial with crossover to study the efficacy of GES in patients with refractory vomiting, with or without gastroparesis.For 4 months, we assessed symptoms in 172 patients (66% women; mean age ± standard deviation, 45 ± 12 years; 133 with gastroparesis) with chronic (12 months) of refractory vomiting (idiopathic, associated with a type 1 or 2 diabetes, or postsurgical). A GES device was implanted and left unactivated until patients were randomly assigned, in a double-blind manner, to groups that received 4 months of stimulation parameters (14 Hz, 5 mA, pulses of 330 μs) or no stimulation (control); 149 patients then crossed over to the other group for 4 months. Patients were examined at the end of each 4-month period (at 5 and 9 months after implantation). Primary endpoints were vomiting score, ranging from 0 (daily vomiting) to 4 (no vomiting), and the quality of life, assessed by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index scoring system. Secondary endpoints were changes in other digestive symptoms, nutritional status, gastric emptying, and control of diabetes.During both phases of the crossover study, vomiting scores were higher in the group with the device on (median score, 2) than the control group (median score, 1; P.001), in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Vomiting scores increased significantly when the device was ON in patients with delayed (P.01) or normal gastric emptying (P = .05). Gastric emptying was not accelerated during the ON period compared with the OFF period. Having the GES turned on was not associated with increased quality of life.In a randomized crossover study, we found that GES reduced the frequency of refractory vomiting in patients with and without diabetes, although it did not accelerate gastric emptying or increase of quality of life. Clinicaltrials.gov, Number: NCT00903799.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
0301 basic medicine
Gastroparesis
Vomiting
Nausea
Electric Stimulation Therapy
Severity of Illness Index
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Double-Blind Method
Refractory
Diabetes mellitus
Humans
Medicine
Prospective Studies
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
2. Zero hunger
Cross-Over Studies
Intention-to-treat analysis
Hepatology
Gastric emptying
business.industry
Gastroenterology
[SDV.MHEP.HEG]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Hépatology and Gastroenterology
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Crossover study
Electrodes, Implanted
3. Good health
Treatment Outcome
030104 developmental biology
Gastric Emptying
Anesthesia
Quality of Life
Female
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
medicine.symptom
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00165085 and 15280012
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology, WB Saunders, 2020, 158 (3), pp.506-514.e2. ⟨10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.018⟩, Gastroenterology, Elsevier, 2020, 158 (3), pp.506-514.e2. ⟨10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.018⟩, Gastroenterology, 2020, 158 (3), pp.506-514.e2. ⟨10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.018⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ffe8ae2347af550aece89408bb8ff522
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.018⟩