Back to Search
Start Over
Randomized Phase II Study of Ramucirumab or Icrucumab in Combination with Capecitabine in Patients with Previously Treated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Source :
- The Oncologist. 22:245-254
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- Oxford University Press (OUP), 2017.
-
Abstract
- Background Icrucumab (ICR) and ramucirumab (RAM) bind vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors 1 and 2 (VEGFR-1 and -2), respectively. This open-label, randomized phase II study evaluated their efficacy and safety in combination with capecitabine (CAP) in patients with previously treated unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Methods Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive CAP (1,000 mg/m2 orally twice daily, days 1-14) alone or in combination with RAM (10 mg/kg intravenously [IV], days 1 and 8) (RAM + CAP) or ICR (12 mg/kg IV, days 1 and 8) (ICR + CAP) every 21 days. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), tumor response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results Of 153 patients randomized, 150 received treatment. Median PFS (95% confidence interval) was 22.1 (12.1-36.1) weeks on RAM + CAP, 7.3 (6.3-13.0) weeks on ICR + CAP, and 19.0 (12.1-24.3) weeks on CAP (hazard ratios [HRs]: 0.691, p = .1315, RAM + CAP versus CAP; 1.480, p = .0851, ICR + CAP versus CAP). Median OS was 67.4 weeks on RAM + CAP, 62.1 weeks on ICR + CAP, and 71.6 weeks on CAP (HRs: 1.833, p = .0283, RAM + CAP versus CAP; 1.468, p = .1550, ICR + CAP versus CAP). There was no statistically significant difference in PFS or OS between either combination arm and CAP. Treatment-related adverse events more frequent (by ≥10%) on RAM + CAP than on CAP were constipation, decreased appetite, headache, epistaxis, and hypertension. Those more frequent (by ≥10%) on ICR + CAP than CAP were anemia, increased lacrimation, periorbital edema, nausea, vomiting, peripheral edema, facial edema, dehydration, and dyspnea. Conclusion Combining RAM or ICR with CAP did not improve PFS in the targeted study population. The Oncologist 2017;22:245-254 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Icrucumab and ramucirumab are recombinant human IgG1 monoclonal antibodies that bind vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors 1 and 2 (VEGFR-1 and -2), respectively. VEGFR-1 activation on endothelial and tumor cell surfaces increases tumor vascularization and growth and supports tumor growth via multiple mechanisms, including contributions to angiogenesis and direct promotion of cancer cell proliferation. Strong preclinical and clinical evidence suggests key roles for VEGF and angiogenesis in breast cancer growth, invasion, and metastasis. This randomized phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of each antibody in combination with capecitabine in patients with previously treated unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0301 basic medicine
Oncology
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Peripheral edema
Phases of clinical research
Breast Neoplasms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Gastroenterology
Disease-Free Survival
Metastasis
Ramucirumab
Capecitabine
03 medical and health sciences
chemistry.chemical_compound
0302 clinical medicine
Breast cancer
Internal medicine
Breast Cancer
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Humans
Medicine
Aged
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1
Neovascularization, Pathologic
business.industry
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2
Metastatic breast cancer
Vascular endothelial growth factor
030104 developmental biology
chemistry
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Female
medicine.symptom
business
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1549490X and 10837159
- Volume :
- 22
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Oncologist
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ffdf79c7a867fa46734f13fca82474d1
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0265