Back to Search Start Over

Ideas and Perspectives: When ocean acidification experiments are not the same, repeatability is not tested

Authors :
P. Williamson
H.-O. Pörtner
S. Widdicombe
J.-P. Gattuso
University of East Anglia [Norwich] (UEA)
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research (AWI)
Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML)
Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Laboratoire d'océanographie de Villefranche (LOV)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de la Mer de Villefranche (IMEV)
Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Biogeosciences, Vol 18, Pp 1787-1792 (2021), Biogeosciences, Biogeosciences, European Geosciences Union, 2021, 18 (5), pp.1787-1792. ⟨10.5194/bg-18-1787-2021⟩
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Can experimental studies on the behavioural impacts of ocean acidification be trusted? That question was raised in early 2020 when a high-profile paper failed to corroborate previously observed responses of coral reef fish to high CO2. New information on the methodologies used in the “replicated” studies now provides a plausible explanation: the experimental conditions were substantially different. High sensitivity to test conditions is characteristic of ocean acidification research; such response variability shows that effects are complex, interacting with many other factors. Open-minded assessment of all research results, both negative and positive, remains the best way to develop process-based understanding. As in other fields, replication studies in ocean acidification are most likely to contribute to scientific advancement when carried out in a spirit of collaboration rather than confrontation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17264189 and 17264170
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Biogeosciences, Vol 18, Pp 1787-1792 (2021), Biogeosciences, Biogeosciences, European Geosciences Union, 2021, 18 (5), pp.1787-1792. ⟨10.5194/bg-18-1787-2021⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ffa8c9a14f0b0f6e408a3b7158640ca5
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1787-2021⟩